Comments on: Unanswered Questions http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/08/16/unanswered-questions/ The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, But It Will Be Blogged Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:22:14 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: Sonya http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/08/16/unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-395 Sonya Sat, 09 Jul 2005 02:42:10 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/08/16/unanswered-questions/#comment-395 <a></a> valtrex http://www.bestrxpills.com

valtrex http://www.bestrxpills.com

]]> By: John G http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/08/16/unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-1414 John G Sun, 17 Aug 2003 10:31:55 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/08/16/unanswered-questions/#comment-1414 <a></a> I tend to think that, unless there is evidence to the contrary, it's important to say right away that there is no evidence of terrorism. Not saying anything implies that there IS evidence. Denying the "possibility" of terrorism, however, is irresponsible. Did people do that? (I'm not sure... I live in Beijing, and haven't been following the news that closely.) What makes me think that the blackout probably wasn't due to terrorism is the absence of attacks coordinated with the blackout. A lot of people were pretty helpless--on subways, etc., and could have been taken advantage of rather easily.

I tend to think that, unless there is evidence to the contrary, it’s important to say right away that there is no evidence of terrorism. Not saying anything implies that there IS evidence.

Denying the “possibility” of terrorism, however, is irresponsible. Did people do that? (I’m not sure… I live in Beijing, and haven’t been following the news that closely.)

What makes me think that the blackout probably wasn’t due to terrorism is the absence of attacks coordinated with the blackout. A lot of people were pretty helpless–on subways, etc., and could have been taken advantage of rather easily.

]]>