<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rorschach Test for the Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, But It Will Be Blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:15:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: xian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I like the circulatory-system analogy. I can&#039;t wait for Clay Shirky&#039;s expos&#233;: I have discovered a power law! A few of the vessels are carrying most of the blood! It&#039;s very unlikely that most of the capillaries will ever become aortas! Film at 11!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I like the circulatory-system analogy. I can&#8217;t wait for Clay Shirky&#8217;s expos&eacute;: I have discovered a power law! A few of the vessels are carrying most of the blood! It&#8217;s very unlikely that most of the capillaries will ever become aortas! Film at 11!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2003 01:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I like the circulatory-system metaphor. I can&#039;t wait for Clay Shirky&#039;s expos&#233;: I have discovered a power law! Only a few of the blood vessels in this body carry most of the blood! Very few of the capillaries will ever become an aorta! Film at 11!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I like the circulatory-system metaphor. I can&#8217;t wait for Clay Shirky&#8217;s expos&eacute;: I have discovered a power law! Only a few of the blood vessels in this body carry most of the blood! Very few of the capillaries will ever become an aorta! Film at 11!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Walsh </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Walsh </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Michael, I agree with your points.  Here are some other to consider.

Frequency of posts may not be the most important yardstick to use.  Some of my favorite bloggers only post one a week.  I rather read an occasional post from a deep thinker than a post a day from a twit.

Also, there are plenty of blogs with fewer than 12 readers that are very useful to their small circle of users.  Project blogs are a prime example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Michael, I agree with your points.  Here are some other to consider.</p>
<p>Frequency of posts may not be the most important yardstick to use.  Some of my favorite bloggers only post one a week.  I rather read an occasional post from a deep thinker than a post a day from a twit.</p>
<p>Also, there are plenty of blogs with fewer than 12 readers that are very useful to their small circle of users.  Project blogs are a prime example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Walsh </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Walsh </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dbnews/2003/11/21/rorschach-test-for-the-blogosphere/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Michael all your points are valid.  Some other thoughts...

I don&#039;t think frequency of posts is the most relevant metric to determine the viability of a blog.  Some of the best blogs on this Harvard site are only updated once a week.  I rather read an occasional post by a deep thinker than a post a day from a twit.

Also, there are plenty of blogs that only have 12 or fewer readers that are useful and relevant to their small audience.  Project blogs for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Michael all your points are valid.  Some other thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think frequency of posts is the most relevant metric to determine the viability of a blog.  Some of the best blogs on this Harvard site are only updated once a week.  I rather read an occasional post by a deep thinker than a post a day from a twit.</p>
<p>Also, there are plenty of blogs that only have 12 or fewer readers that are useful and relevant to their small audience.  Project blogs for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
