Expensive Name Dropping

Just when you thought the Federal Election Commission had it out for the blogosphere, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors took it up a notch and announced yesterday that it will soon vote on a city ordinance that would require local bloggers to register with the city Ethics Commission and report all blog-related costs that exceed $1,000 in the aggregate.


Blogs that mention candidates for local office that receive more than 500 hits will be forced to pay a registration fee and will be subject to website traffic audits, according to Chad Jacobs, a San Francisco City Attorney.


This is certainly a bizarre development.  Why only local candidates? Does it apply to blogs hosted in Timbucktu as well as SF? Does an inspirational sack of the Kind constitute a “blog related expense”? Are they supplying their own free traffic meters? If you mention the names of all five candidates to a local office, do you have to pay five registration fees? Is this the wave of the future?


from Personal Democracy Forum

No Responses to “Expensive Name Dropping”

No comments yet

Leave a Reply


Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress