<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Down But Not Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/</link>
	<description>The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, But It Will Be Blogged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:22:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Dowbrigade's little bro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/comment-page-1/#comment-44854</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dowbrigade's little bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/#comment-44854</guid>
		<description>Michael -

At what point, if ever, should we expect your admission that you have seriously underestimated the strength of Barack&#039;s candidacy and his legitimacy as the democratic nominee?  Can&#039;t you even give the guy some grudging respect for his ability to adapt to the moment and learn from past mistakes?  If, as you say, he simply &quot;didn&#039;t get it&quot; in 2004 when he thought &quot;new media&quot; meant Fox News, how is it that he was able to tap in to the power of the Internet to raise hundreds of millions of dollars from small and first-time contributors?  Remember, this guy came up on the south side of Chicago .... what I think you are missing is his ability to fight just as dirty as the Clintons.  The difference is that he is so good and so smooth, he (or his surrogates) can eviscerate you without leaving any fingerprints.  Have you read some of the things he did to get rid of his competitors in his state level campaigns in Illinois?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael -</p>
<p>At what point, if ever, should we expect your admission that you have seriously underestimated the strength of Barack&#8217;s candidacy and his legitimacy as the democratic nominee?  Can&#8217;t you even give the guy some grudging respect for his ability to adapt to the moment and learn from past mistakes?  If, as you say, he simply &#8220;didn&#8217;t get it&#8221; in 2004 when he thought &#8220;new media&#8221; meant Fox News, how is it that he was able to tap in to the power of the Internet to raise hundreds of millions of dollars from small and first-time contributors?  Remember, this guy came up on the south side of Chicago &#8230;. what I think you are missing is his ability to fight just as dirty as the Clintons.  The difference is that he is so good and so smooth, he (or his surrogates) can eviscerate you without leaving any fingerprints.  Have you read some of the things he did to get rid of his competitors in his state level campaigns in Illinois?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/comment-page-1/#comment-44737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dowbrigade/2008/06/12/hillary-down-but-not-out/#comment-44737</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I think shes down for the count. The best we can hope for is a seat as VP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I think shes down for the count. The best we can hope for is a seat as VP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
