<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>Damning the River &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr</link>
	<description>and other topics from a studious newbie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>High Time for a Post</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/07/21/high-time-for-a-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/07/21/high-time-for-a-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtrdev/2005/07/21/high-time-for-a-post/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sorry to all of you who expected more from this blog. It&#8217;s been far too
long. My poker playing slowed over the last six
months.&#160; I was playing party poker bonuses at .50/1, but&#160;
there wasn&#8217;t much to report.&#160; In fact, I think during that time I
was regressing, only playing to get through the bonuses and thus not
really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a58'></a></p>
<p>Sorry to all of you who expected more from this blog. It&#8217;s been far too<br />
long. My poker playing slowed over the last six<br />
months.&nbsp; I was playing party poker bonuses at .50/1, but&nbsp;<br />
there wasn&#8217;t much to report.&nbsp; In fact, I think during that time I<br />
was regressing, only playing to get through the bonuses and thus not<br />
really enjoying the poker.&nbsp; it wasn&#8217;t because of my last Vegas<br />
experience in Jan., in which I booked my first major win.&nbsp; For<br />
many reasons, my passion just got<br />
sucked out of it.&nbsp; Last summer, poker was exciting &#8211; it was<br />
a meaningful hobby.&nbsp; But other things began to take it&#8217;s place.</p>
<p>Well a few things have brought the fun back recently.&nbsp; First, the<br />
last two weeks have featured a no limit ring game among friends here in<br />
San Francisco.&nbsp; Last week I was up, this week I was even, but both<br />
were great learning experiences.&nbsp;&nbsp; I haven&#8217;t played much no<br />
limit overall, and it really brought some excitement back into poker<br />
for me. We&#8217;re not playing for a lot of money, we&#8217;re drinking plenty,<br />
and having fun.</p>
<p>From tonight, two hands stick with me.&nbsp; We&#8217;re 5 handed.&nbsp;<br />
Playing .10/.20, I called a pre-flop raise of .30 with QTo from the big<br />
blind. The flop comes 56T, with the 56 of spades.&nbsp; Three players.<br />
One checks, I bet out 1.50, get raised by math-smart, somewhat unpredictable<br />
player to 3.00. He had initially made the .30 raise and had position on<br />
me.&nbsp; I call the additional 1.50, hoping for a blank and thinking<br />
he might have been trying to push his straight or flush draw.&nbsp; The<br />
next card is the 2 of clubs, a seeming blank.&nbsp; I then put him all<br />
in for 8 bucks, about the size of the pot, he calls, shows me ATo.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t know if I played this right. I felt like he could have been<br />
pushing a draw or a weaker high pair, because he could make a move like<br />
that and had position me. I figured that making a pot sized bet was my<br />
only chance to win it and in fact 5 handed top pair solid kicker is not<br />
a bad shot.&nbsp; I was worried about ATo or KTo because he made the<br />
initial raise, but he could have had spades or a mid-pair like 88 and<br />
made the raise.&nbsp; Still, perhaps because he made that raise I<br />
should have been able to narrow his hand down further. He didn&#8217;t have<br />
T9 or T8 because he wouldn&#8217;t have raised there, nor did he probably<br />
have lucky two pair. Maybe JT, but probably not.&nbsp; With that in<br />
mind, he either had a mid pair or he had me out-kicked.&nbsp; If that&#8217;s<br />
the case, was my move right? I dunno.</p>
<p>Later on that night, we faced a similar situation but with more money<br />
on the line.&nbsp; I had KJs in the big, called the pre-flop raise to<br />
.50.&nbsp; Flop comes KQ4, rainbow.&nbsp; I check, gets bet to 1.50,<br />
not by the raiser but by the same smart-unpredictable player, I put in<br />
4, he calls.&nbsp; The turn is a 4, still rainbow, I bet 5, he goes all<br />
in for 12 more.&nbsp; I call, he had K8o, hits the 8 on the river. My<br />
call of 12 into the 39 dollar pot seems right.&nbsp; He didn&#8217;t raise<br />
pre-flop, so I didn&#8217;t put him on KQ or AK.&nbsp; Unlikely for him to<br />
have K4, even though he was in the big, and he wouldn&#8217;t have called my<br />
bets on the flop with just a 4 or J4.&nbsp; He could have KT, KQ or K8, or just be on a bluff. But I felt I had it right.</p>
<p>An important point though: his outs weren&#8217;t just the 8s.&nbsp; The<br />
remaining K, 4, or Aces would have split the pot &#8211; that&#8217;s 8 extra outs<br />
for him. I&#8217;m still ahead by a decent margin with one to come, but it<br />
still makes my decision a bit closer.</p>
<p>Both those losses felt terrible, but overall the fun was back in<br />
poker.&nbsp; I still feel like I&#8217;m a shitty no limit player &#8211; I had great cards tonight and didn&#8217;t make a damn dime. I won a no<br />
limit tournament among friends the other night, and I can only remember<br />
two things from it. One, how shitty I played (how could I call with<br />
second pair medium kicker with 2 to 1? what kind of hubris led me to do<br />
that?).&nbsp; Second, and much more importantly, how much fun I&#8217;ve made<br />
playing among friends for meager amounts.&nbsp; </p>
<p>And with that, I go to Vegas to play some more low limit among actual<br />
human beings.&nbsp; Among a host of friends attending <a href="http://www.defcon.org">Defcon</a>, I go with Doc Riley, the smart-unpredictable poker<br />
buddy of mine, who I need to train to play low limit.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve reread<br />
SSHE.&nbsp; I&#8217;m playing around with my simulator. I&#8217;m ready to hit the town, put on my table persona, and have a good time.</p>
<p>I hope I have half as much fun as <a href="http://guinnessandpokerblogspot.com">Iggy</a>,<br />
<a href="http://taopoker.blogspot.com/">Pauly</a>, and <a href="http://www.wilwheaton.net/">Wil,</a> <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/aggregator">among many others</a>, have been having. Even though I haven&#8217;t been posting,<br />
you bet I&#8217;ve still been reading. I was never really a full member of the poker<br />
blogging community, devoting much more of my time to the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings">copyfighters</a>.&nbsp;<br />
But I still get a kick out of the poker bloggers and wish I could put<br />
my energy into hanging out with y&#8217;all too.&nbsp; You&#8217;re all<br />
terrific and deserve <a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050719glaser/">all the attention you&#8217;re getting.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/07/21/high-time-for-a-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finals and Vegas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/01/23/finals-and-vegas/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/01/23/finals-and-vegas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtrdev/2005/01/23/finals-and-vegas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tests up the wazoo here, but I&#8217;m in preparation next weekend in Vegas. News to follow&#8230;
Really, I&#8217;m just posting to make sure you see&#160;AlCantHang&#8217;s recent classic line:
&#8220;And of course I&#8217;ll continue to play the 5 player SnG&#8217;s where 3 people get paid. It&#8217;s almost like the Special Olympics where everyone gets a trophy.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a56'></a></p>
<p><P>Tests up the wazoo here, but I&#8217;m in preparation next weekend in Vegas. News to follow&#8230;</P><br />
<P>Really, I&#8217;m just posting to make sure you see&nbsp;<A href="http://alcanthang.blogspot.com/2005_01_09_alcanthang_archive.html#110563302041038668">AlCantHang&#8217;s recent classic line:</A></P><br />
<P>&#8220;And of course I&#8217;ll continue to play the 5 player SnG&#8217;s where 3 people get paid. It&#8217;s almost like the Special Olympics where everyone gets a trophy.&#8221;</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2005/01/23/finals-and-vegas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Worked!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2004/08/09/it-worked/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2004/08/09/it-worked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtrdev/2004/08/09/it-worked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Welcome to your new weblog. To get started, please visit this page for tips on posting to your weblog, and participating in the weblog community here. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a2'></a></p>
<p>Welcome to your new weblog. To get started, please <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/gettingStarted">visit this page</a> for tips on posting to your weblog, and participating in the weblog community here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dtr/2004/08/09/it-worked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
