Comments on: DOJ & FTC Support Non-lawyers Doing Real Estate Closings in Georgia http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-doing-real-estate-closings-in-georgia/ breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Ismail Shihadi http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-doing-real-estate-closings-in-georgia/comment-page-1/#comment-179077 Ismail Shihadi Tue, 20 May 2008 21:27:34 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-d#comment-179077 Although its an old article, I found it interesting to read ------------------------thanks Although its an old article, I found it interesting to read
————————thanks

]]> By: Mickey Patterson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-doing-real-estate-closings-in-georgia/comment-page-1/#comment-5033 Mickey Patterson Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:14:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-d#comment-5033 <a></a> After reading the State Bar Of Georgia opinion and explanation for the opinion (which I oppose) and the DOJ and FTC brief it is evident to me that the State Bar of Georgia has no interest in protecting the integrity of conveyances, but of protecting their monopoly in the execution of those conveyances.

After reading the State Bar Of Georgia opinion and explanation for the opinion (which I oppose) and the DOJ and FTC brief it is evident to me that the State Bar of Georgia has no interest in protecting the integrity of conveyances, but of protecting their monopoly in the execution of those conveyances.

]]> By: Mickey Patterson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-doing-real-estate-closings-in-georgia/comment-page-1/#comment-6953 Mickey Patterson Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:14:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/07/29/doj-ftc-support-non-lawyers-d#comment-6953 <a></a> After reading the State Bar Of Georgia opinion and explanation for the opinion (which I oppose) and the DOJ and FTC brief it is evident to me that the State Bar of Georgia has no interest in protecting the integrity of conveyances, but of protecting their monopoly in the execution of those conveyances.

After reading the State Bar Of Georgia opinion and explanation for the opinion (which I oppose) and the DOJ and FTC brief it is evident to me that the State Bar of Georgia has no interest in protecting the integrity of conveyances, but of protecting their monopoly in the execution of those conveyances.

]]>