Comments on: No Need for Unbundlephobia http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/ breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/comment-page-1/#comment-5052 David Giacalone Sun, 24 Aug 2003 01:07:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/#comment-5052 <a></a> As usual, Carolyn, we are in agreement. Free riders exist in every segment of every society, I would suspect.   We all need to be a little wary and to try to avoid doing it ourselves, while building it into the overhead of life.  [I just resisted the temptation to rail again about Tax Whiners.]

As usual, Carolyn, we are in agreement.
Free riders exist in every segment of every society, I would suspect.   We all need to be a little wary and to try to avoid doing it ourselves, while building it into the overhead of life.  [I just resisted the temptation to rail again about Tax Whiners.]

]]> By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/comment-page-1/#comment-6972 David Giacalone Sun, 24 Aug 2003 01:07:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/#comment-6972 <a></a> As usual, Carolyn, we are in agreement. Free riders exist in every segment of every society, I would suspect.   We all need to be a little wary and to try to avoid doing it ourselves, while building it into the overhead of life.  [I just resisted the temptation to rail again about Tax Whiners.]

As usual, Carolyn, we are in agreement.
Free riders exist in every segment of every society, I would suspect.   We all need to be a little wary and to try to avoid doing it ourselves, while building it into the overhead of life.  [I just resisted the temptation to rail again about Tax Whiners.]

]]> By: Carolyn Elefant http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/comment-page-1/#comment-5050 Carolyn Elefant Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:38:02 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/#comment-5050 <a></a> David: You're right about the freeloading comment. Many clients seek to use unbundling in good faith and of course, should be allowed that option irrespective of resources. However, as any solo will tell you, there are some clients who do want to take advantage of a well intentioned or novice lawyer who is willing to offer unbundled service and get more than what is offered. (just as I'll be the first to admit there are lawyers and other professionals who will take advantage of and gouge clients on bills). It's this subset that should be avoided.

David: You’re right about the freeloading comment. Many clients seek to use unbundling in good faith and of course, should be allowed that option irrespective of resources. However, as any solo will tell you, there are some clients who do want to take advantage of a well intentioned or novice lawyer who is willing to offer unbundled service and get more than what is offered. (just as I’ll be the first to admit there are lawyers and other professionals who will take advantage of and gouge clients on bills). It’s this subset that should be avoided.

]]> By: Carolyn Elefant http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/comment-page-1/#comment-6970 Carolyn Elefant Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:38:02 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2003/08/23/no-need-for-unbundlephobia/#comment-6970 <a></a> David: You're right about the freeloading comment. Many clients seek to use unbundling in good faith and of course, should be allowed that option irrespective of resources. However, as any solo will tell you, there are some clients who do want to take advantage of a well intentioned or novice lawyer who is willing to offer unbundled service and get more than what is offered. (just as I'll be the first to admit there are lawyers and other professionals who will take advantage of and gouge clients on bills). It's this subset that should be avoided.

David: You’re right about the freeloading comment. Many clients seek to use unbundling in good faith and of course, should be allowed that option irrespective of resources. However, as any solo will tell you, there are some clients who do want to take advantage of a well intentioned or novice lawyer who is willing to offer unbundled service and get more than what is offered. (just as I’ll be the first to admit there are lawyers and other professionals who will take advantage of and gouge clients on bills). It’s this subset that should be avoided.

]]>