<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Dads Angrily Protest Divorce Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lytron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-203340</link>
		<dc:creator>Lytron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-203340</guid>
		<description>I also agree - it’s definitely important to have a father figure involved in a child’s life. Divorce can often tear families apart in this way, sadly.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
[&lt;em&gt;Ed. Note&lt;/em&gt;:  The URL and advertising aspects  have been removed from this Comment, because it&#039;s primary purpose appeared to be implanting Comment Spam. We vastly prefer that the Comment name be that of a person and not a business, website, product or product category.]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree &#8211; it’s definitely important to have a father figure involved in a child’s life. Divorce can often tear families apart in this way, sadly.</p>
<blockquote><p>
[<em>Ed. Note</em>:  The URL and advertising aspects  have been removed from this Comment, because it's primary purpose appeared to be implanting Comment Spam. We vastly prefer that the Comment name be that of a person and not a business, website, product or product category.]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Lawyers Part of the Problem in Parent Custody Cases? &#124; Parent Custody Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-190823</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Lawyers Part of the Problem in Parent Custody Cases? &#124; Parent Custody Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-190823</guid>
		<description>[...] f/k/a . . . &#187; UK Dads Angrily Protest Divorce Lawyers - Claiming that divorce lawyers pour petrol on the flames of divorcing couples, and deprive children of the care of their fathers, members of the group Fathers 4 Justice have been staging dramatic protests in the United Kingdom. Fifteen fathers wearing white contamination outfits stormed the offices of Parker Bird solicitors in Queen Street, Huddersfield with sirens blaring, whistles blowing and flags waving. The&#160;article ( Angry fathers in law firm protest, 02-26-04, via law. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] f/k/a . . . &raquo; UK Dads Angrily Protest Divorce Lawyers &#8211; Claiming that divorce lawyers pour petrol on the flames of divorcing couples, and deprive children of the care of their fathers, members of the group Fathers 4 Justice have been staging dramatic protests in the United Kingdom. Fifteen fathers wearing white contamination outfits stormed the offices of Parker Bird solicitors in Queen Street, Huddersfield with sirens blaring, whistles blowing and flags waving. The&nbsp;article ( Angry fathers in law firm protest, 02-26-04, via law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Cavers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-182984</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Cavers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-182984</guid>
		<description>You are correct in that the courts favor the birth mother over the father. I have represented fathers that have gotten full custody of their children, but it can be an uphill battle to prove those facts in the divorce case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct in that the courts favor the birth mother over the father. I have represented fathers that have gotten full custody of their children, but it can be an uphill battle to prove those facts in the divorce case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tips On Parenting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-84247</link>
		<dc:creator>Tips On Parenting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-84247</guid>
		<description>I agree - it&#039;s definitely important to have a father figure involved in a child&#039;s life. Divorce can often tear families apart in this way, sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; it&#8217;s definitely important to have a father figure involved in a child&#8217;s life. Divorce can often tear families apart in this way, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; divorce mediation: mutual self-help</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-11253</link>
		<dc:creator>shlep: the Self-Help Law ExPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; divorce mediation: mutual self-help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-11253</guid>
		<description>[...] david giacalone - October 8, 2006 @ 4:10 pm &#183; Resources-Consumer, Viewpoint   The newest Nolo Law in Plain English podcast was posted yesterday, and asks the question Do Dads Get a Fair Shake in Divorce? (with Paul Mandelstein, author of &#8220;Always Dad: Being a Great Father During &amp; After Divorce,&#8221; (Nolo). The podcast &#8221;discusses issues of custody, fairness, &#8216;right speech,&#8217; and the effect of past actions on divorce decisions.&#8221;  (Oct. 7, 2006, 12 min.)  Although it&#8217;s a good one (ask ethicalEsq), I don&#8217;t want to opine on the question presented by Mandelstein.  Instead, I want to suggest that divorce (or custody/visitation) mediation can often be the best way to create a parenting plan that is fair to both of the parents and to the child, while avoiding some of the worst aspects of litigating family law issues.   Admittedly, I&#8217;m biased on the issue of litigating vs. mediating divorces (even though retired): Volunteer work for the D.C. Superior Court &#8220;Multi-door&#8221; Family Mediation program, in 1987 and 1988, led me to switch from antitrust to family law, with the goal of creating a divorce mediation practice.   Then, representing scores of children in Family Court custody and visitation disputes, and in contested divorces, gave me a close-up view of how wrong-headed litigation (and lawyers) can be in such cases &#8212; while my own mediation practice demonstrated that even two angry people can very often be helped to reach agreements that, for the sake of their children, they both want to make successful.     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] david giacalone &#8211; October 8, 2006 @ 4:10 pm &#183; Resources-Consumer, Viewpoint   The newest Nolo Law in Plain English podcast was posted yesterday, and asks the question Do Dads Get a Fair Shake in Divorce? (with Paul Mandelstein, author of &#8220;Always Dad: Being a Great Father During &amp; After Divorce,&#8221; (Nolo). The podcast &#8221;discusses issues of custody, fairness, &#8216;right speech,&#8217; and the effect of past actions on divorce decisions.&#8221;  (Oct. 7, 2006, 12 min.)  Although it&#8217;s a good one (ask ethicalEsq), I don&#8217;t want to opine on the question presented by Mandelstein.  Instead, I want to suggest that divorce (or custody/visitation) mediation can often be the best way to create a parenting plan that is fair to both of the parents and to the child, while avoiding some of the worst aspects of litigating family law issues.   Admittedly, I&#8217;m biased on the issue of litigating vs. mediating divorces (even though retired): Volunteer work for the D.C. Superior Court &#8220;Multi-door&#8221; Family Mediation program, in 1987 and 1988, led me to switch from antitrust to family law, with the goal of creating a divorce mediation practice.   Then, representing scores of children in Family Court custody and visitation disputes, and in contested divorces, gave me a close-up view of how wrong-headed litigation (and lawyers) can be in such cases &#8212; while my own mediation practice demonstrated that even two angry people can very often be helped to reach agreements that, for the sake of their children, they both want to make successful.     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whistler Hotels </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>Whistler Hotels </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Arlington Hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Arlington Hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whistler Hotels </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>Whistler Hotels </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Arlington Hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Arlington Hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offshore Sailing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>Offshore Sailing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Book Review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Book Review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offshore Sailing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6436</link>
		<dc:creator>Offshore Sailing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-6436</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Book Review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Book Review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heat Exchangers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>Heat Exchangers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Hot Hot Heat Music Video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Hot Hot Heat Music Video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heat Exchangers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>Heat Exchangers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Hot Hot Heat Music Video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Hot Hot Heat Music Video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weather Forecast</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4395</link>
		<dc:creator>Weather Forecast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-4395</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Weather Underground</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Weather Underground</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weather Forecast</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6315</link>
		<dc:creator>Weather Forecast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-6315</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Weather Underground</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Weather Underground</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pesho</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-4303</link>
		<dc:creator>Pesho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-4303</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Very nice blog. It is very helpful. http://www.bignews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Very nice blog. It is very helpful. <a href="http://www.bignews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bignews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pesho</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6223</link>
		<dc:creator>Pesho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-6223</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Very nice blog. It is very helpful. http://www.bignews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Very nice blog. It is very helpful. <a href="http://www.bignews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bignews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Swanson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divorce-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-5265</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/02/26/uk-dads-angrily-protest-divor#comment-5265</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Sadly, a seminar about so-called reverse discrimination like that outlined in this post would not qualify for Elimination of Bias credit in Minnesota.  Here is a post on the subject:
http://599to1.blogspot.com/#107838118786826125</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Sadly, a seminar about so-called reverse discrimination like that outlined in this post would not qualify for Elimination of Bias credit in Minnesota.  Here is a post on the subject:<br />
<a href="http://599to1.blogspot.com/#107838118786826125" rel="nofollow">http://599to1.blogspot.com/#107838118786826125</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
