<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sovereignty Promise as Exit Strategy/Excuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-exit-strategyexcuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-exit-strategyexcuse/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-exit-strategyexcuse/comment-page-1/#comment-5425</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2004 06:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-ex#comment-5425</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

The coming October surprise: Yup, I too thought that Powell&#039;s comment hadn&#039;t been reported on enough, but I hadn&#039;t thought of the political implications.   Like, the new Iraqi government starts in August, then by mid-Sept (say, just after the GOP convention), it requests a US withdrawal, and the first phase starts in time for some of our boys to visibly come home in the last half of October.  Of course, that doesn&#039;t have to be the end of it; there could be &quot;problems&quot; after the election that keep the rest of the troops there for a few more years, but the Bush campaign would harvest the political value of their &quot;exit strategy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>The coming October surprise: Yup, I too thought that Powell&#8217;s comment hadn&#8217;t been reported on enough, but I hadn&#8217;t thought of the political implications.   Like, the new Iraqi government starts in August, then by mid-Sept (say, just after the GOP convention), it requests a US withdrawal, and the first phase starts in time for some of our boys to visibly come home in the last half of October.  Of course, that doesn&#8217;t have to be the end of it; there could be &#8220;problems&#8221; after the election that keep the rest of the troops there for a few more years, but the Bush campaign would harvest the political value of their &#8220;exit strategy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-exit-strategyexcuse/comment-page-1/#comment-7345</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2004 06:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/18/the-sovereignty-promise-as-ex#comment-7345</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

The coming October surprise: Yup, I too thought that Powell&#039;s comment hadn&#039;t been reported on enough, but I hadn&#039;t thought of the political implications.   Like, the new Iraqi government starts in August, then by mid-Sept (say, just after the GOP convention), it requests a US withdrawal, and the first phase starts in time for some of our boys to visibly come home in the last half of October.  Of course, that doesn&#039;t have to be the end of it; there could be &quot;problems&quot; after the election that keep the rest of the troops there for a few more years, but the Bush campaign would harvest the political value of their &quot;exit strategy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>The coming October surprise: Yup, I too thought that Powell&#8217;s comment hadn&#8217;t been reported on enough, but I hadn&#8217;t thought of the political implications.   Like, the new Iraqi government starts in August, then by mid-Sept (say, just after the GOP convention), it requests a US withdrawal, and the first phase starts in time for some of our boys to visibly come home in the last half of October.  Of course, that doesn&#8217;t have to be the end of it; there could be &#8220;problems&#8221; after the election that keep the rest of the troops there for a few more years, but the Bush campaign would harvest the political value of their &#8220;exit strategy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
