Comments on: Sue-Dough-Logic http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/ breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Richard Davis http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4225 Richard Davis Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:15:51 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-4225 <a></a> Nice one, but what about der weg ? anywya, congrats from me.

Nice one, but what about der weg ? anywya, congrats from me.

]]> By: Richard Davis http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-6145 Richard Davis Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:15:51 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-6145 <a></a> Nice one, but what about der weg ? anywya, congrats from me.

Nice one, but what about der weg ? anywya, congrats from me.

]]> By: Peter Jackson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4179 Peter Jackson Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:56:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-4179 <a></a> A heap of wheat, says the Song of Songs but I've never seen wheat in a pile :) did you like it?

A heap of wheat, says the Song of Songs
but I’ve never seen wheat in a pile :)
did you like it?

]]> By: Peter Jackson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-6099 Peter Jackson Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:56:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-6099 <a></a> A heap of wheat, says the Song of Songs but I've never seen wheat in a pile :) did you like it?

A heap of wheat, says the Song of Songs
but I’ve never seen wheat in a pile :)
did you like it?

]]> By: Joe Fuentes http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4132 Joe Fuentes Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:45:44 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-4132 <a></a> The text was good, but i stil cant find the play ipdates. looking for it dude.

The text was good, but i stil cant find the play ipdates. looking for it dude.

]]> By: Joe Fuentes http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-6052 Joe Fuentes Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:45:44 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-6052 <a></a> The text was good, but i stil cant find the play ipdates. looking for it dude.

The text was good, but i stil cant find the play ipdates. looking for it dude.

]]> By: Daniel http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4087 Daniel Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:52:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-4087 <a></a> propecia http://www.bestrxpills.com

propecia http://www.bestrxpills.com

]]> By: Daniel http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-6007 Daniel Tue, 05 Jul 2005 07:52:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-6007 <a></a> propecia http://www.bestrxpills.com

propecia http://www.bestrxpills.com

]]> By: Mila http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-4015 Mila Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:30:55 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-4015 <a></a> Diet Pills http://www.nofatonline.com/

Diet Pills http://www.nofatonline.com/

]]> By: Mila http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-5935 Mila Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:30:55 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-5935 <a></a> Diet Pills http://www.nofatonline.com/

Diet Pills http://www.nofatonline.com/

]]> By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-5422 David Giacalone Fri, 21 May 2004 22:58:45 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-5422 <a></a> Thank you, U.  (You almost make this weblog sound boring.  Maybe we need a little more sensationalism.)  I always appreciate your comments, whether concurring or dissenting.  I hope you don't feel the need to Comment <EM>every</EM> time you disagree -- you'd never get any billing done!

Thank you, U.  (You almost make this weblog sound boring.  Maybe we need a little more sensationalism.)
 I always appreciate your comments, whether concurring or dissenting.  I hope you don’t feel the need to Comment every time you disagree — you’d never get any billing done!

]]> By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-7342 David Giacalone Fri, 21 May 2004 22:58:45 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-7342 <a></a> Thank you, U.  (You almost make this weblog sound boring.  Maybe we need a little more sensationalism.)  I always appreciate your comments, whether concurring or dissenting.  I hope you don't feel the need to Comment <EM>every</EM> time you disagree -- you'd never get any billing done!

Thank you, U.  (You almost make this weblog sound boring.  Maybe we need a little more sensationalism.)
 I always appreciate your comments, whether concurring or dissenting.  I hope you don’t feel the need to Comment every time you disagree — you’d never get any billing done!

]]> By: UCL http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-5421 UCL Fri, 21 May 2004 22:13:45 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-5421 <a></a> As you know I don't always agree with your opinions, but most of the time I do (evidenced by only a few of your posts to which I've voiced dissent). This is yet another post with which I'm in full agreement. I find Overlawyered.com to be a bit on the sensationalist side, relying more on flashy headlines and wacky stories than on logic and reasoning. That contrasts sharply with this blog's approach, and this post is a perfect example.

As you know I don’t always agree with your opinions, but most of the time I do (evidenced by only a few of your posts to which I’ve voiced dissent). This is yet another post with which I’m in full agreement.

I find Overlawyered.com to be a bit on the sensationalist side, relying more on flashy headlines and wacky stories than on logic and reasoning. That contrasts sharply with this blog’s approach, and this post is a perfect example.

]]> By: UCL http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-7341 UCL Fri, 21 May 2004 22:13:45 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2004/05/20/sue-dough-logic/#comment-7341 <a></a> As you know I don't always agree with your opinions, but most of the time I do (evidenced by only a few of your posts to which I've voiced dissent). This is yet another post with which I'm in full agreement. I find Overlawyered.com to be a bit on the sensationalist side, relying more on flashy headlines and wacky stories than on logic and reasoning. That contrasts sharply with this blog's approach, and this post is a perfect example.

As you know I don’t always agree with your opinions, but most of the time I do (evidenced by only a few of your posts to which I’ve voiced dissent). This is yet another post with which I’m in full agreement.

I find Overlawyered.com to be a bit on the sensationalist side, relying more on flashy headlines and wacky stories than on logic and reasoning. That contrasts sharply with this blog’s approach, and this post is a perfect example.

]]>