<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poetry Not Punditry</title>
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/</link>
	<description>"breathless punditry" and "one-breath poetry" with David Giacalone</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5442</link>
		<author>David Giacalone</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 05:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Absolutely.&#160; There's nothing like living in the moment - and appreciating the little things -- to&#160;help the mind-body run smoothly&#160;(intestines included)&#160;.&#160; (metaphysical Metamucil?)
Practicing law seems like a good way to exacerbate Crohn's disease.&#160; I hope the swVa legal scene is kinder and gentler than elsewhere, and that chronic weblogging doesn't keep you from listening to your body needs and complaints.
Hope you'll get back to this neighborhood, Steve.&#160; Be well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Absolutely.&nbsp; There&#8217;s nothing like living in the moment - and appreciating the little things &#8212; to&nbsp;help the mind-body run smoothly&nbsp;(intestines included)&nbsp;.&nbsp; (metaphysical Metamucil?)<br />
Practicing law seems like a good way to exacerbate Crohn&#8217;s disease.&nbsp; I hope the swVa legal scene is kinder and gentler than elsewhere, and that chronic weblogging doesn&#8217;t keep you from listening to your body needs and complaints.<br />
Hope you&#8217;ll get back to this neighborhood, Steve.&nbsp; Be well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5441</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 00:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5441</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

You saying I should try haiku for Crohn's disease?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>You saying I should try haiku for Crohn&#8217;s disease?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Wallace</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5437</link>
		<author>George Wallace</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 19:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5437</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

That would be the typically lawyer-like thing to do, wouldn't it, fuzzying up distinctions between unlike quantities and qualities?  Not a half bad idea, though I am trying hard not to succumb to it in the appellate brief that I am drafting as I very pointedly &lt;em&gt;am not posting to my weblog&lt;/em&gt; today.

I wonder what wine goes best with cold turkey...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>That would be the typically lawyer-like thing to do, wouldn&#8217;t it, fuzzying up distinctions between unlike quantities and qualities?  Not a half bad idea, though I am trying hard not to succumb to it in the appellate brief that I am drafting as I very pointedly <em>am not posting to my weblog</em> today.</p>
<p>I wonder what wine goes best with cold turkey&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5436</link>
		<author>David Giacalone</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 16:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5436</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Gee, George, you could put me in &lt;EM&gt;both&lt;/EM&gt; sections, kind soul and&#160;lover or ambiguities that you are.&#160; As you know, I'm hoping that people (lawyers, even)&#160;who would not otherwise be looking for poetry -- or think of themselves as poetry lovers -- will stop or stumble by this weblog and get hooked on haiku.&#160; 
Grumpy haiku could be fun, so watch this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Gee, George, you could put me in <em>both</em> sections, kind soul and&nbsp;lover or ambiguities that you are.&nbsp; As you know, I&#8217;m hoping that people (lawyers, even)&nbsp;who would not otherwise be looking for poetry &#8212; or think of themselves as poetry lovers &#8212; will stop or stumble by this weblog and get hooked on haiku.&nbsp;<br />
Grumpy haiku could be fun, so watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Wallace</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5435</link>
		<author>George Wallace</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 15:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2004/05/26/poetry-not-punditry/#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I suppose this means I'll need to move you off of my legal links list and in to the poetry section, where you will be most welcome.  Peace upon you, dude, and don't even &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; of taking up the challenge of writing grumpy haiku (if such a thing is possible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I suppose this means I&#8217;ll need to move you off of my legal links list and in to the poetry section, where you will be most welcome.  Peace upon you, dude, and don&#8217;t even <em>think</em> of taking up the challenge of writing grumpy haiku (if such a thing is possible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
