I trust that it is Happy Jack Valenti, and not Ernie, that you mean to demean as a “mouthpiece.” In equestrian parlance, a mouthpiece as a “bit.” Mr. Valenti, I fear, belongs at the other end of the horse.

I trust that it is Happy Jack Valenti, and not Ernie, that you mean to demean as a “mouthpiece.” In equestrian parlance, a mouthpiece as a “bit.” Mr. Valenti, I fear, belongs at the other end of the horse.

I don’t see a problem but we should probably define the terms first. What exactly does the “Judeo-Christian side of an issue of law” require? The phrase is so vague and subject to so many different interpretations that it’s practically meaningless.

I don’t see a problem but we should probably define the terms first. What exactly does the “Judeo-Christian side of an issue of law” require? The phrase is so vague and subject to so many different interpretations that it’s practically meaningless.

Well, that might cover the “diligence owed the client” issue, but what about “officer of the court”?

Well, that might cover the “diligence owed the client” issue, but what about “officer of the court”?

The answer to that last question is no, unless you land a job as corporate counsel to the 700 Club.

The answer to that last question is no, unless you land a job as corporate counsel to the 700 Club.