Hey, Ted, I said “considered,” not ”fully considered” or “usefully considered”.  [One-breath punditry can't be bothered with such minutia!]  Of course, at times, I just point and let the reader decide whether the writer has said anything worthwhile.
Ron did point to an experience he had personally, where pre-review prevented a case “with no plausible connection between my care and the problems [the plaintiff] faced.”  That’s certainly one definition of frivolous.
I’m waiting for George M. Wallace, Esq., to fulfill his promise to address this definition issue — and I bet he will do so fully and usefully.

Hey, Ted, I said “considered,” not ”fully considered” or “usefully considered”.  [One-breath punditry can't be bothered with such minutia!]  Of course, at times, I just point and let the reader decide whether the writer has said anything worthwhile.
Ron did point to an experience he had personally, where pre-review prevented a case “with no plausible connection between my care and the problems [the plaintiff] faced.”  That’s certainly one definition of frivolous.
I’m waiting for George M. Wallace, Esq., to fulfill his promise to address this definition issue — and I bet he will do so fully and usefully.

Did Ron consider the topic? To me, he dodged it by calling it “minutia.”

Did Ron consider the topic? To me, he dodged it by calling it “minutia.”