<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the pond&#8217;s frozen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louisville hotels</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>Louisville hotels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Louisville hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Louisville hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louisville hotels</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Louisville hotels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Louisville hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Louisville hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beijing Hotels </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4810</link>
		<dc:creator>Beijing Hotels </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4810</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Irving Hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Irving Hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beijing Hotels </title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6730</link>
		<dc:creator>Beijing Hotels </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6730</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Irving Hotels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Irving Hotels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heat Exchangers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>Heat Exchangers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Boxing History</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Boxing History</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heat Exchangers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6419</link>
		<dc:creator>Heat Exchangers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6419</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Boxing History</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Boxing History</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bow Hunting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4487</link>
		<dc:creator>Bow Hunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4487</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Alaska Hunting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Alaska Hunting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bow Hunting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6407</link>
		<dc:creator>Bow Hunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6407</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Alaska Hunting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Alaska Hunting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Dealer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Dealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Classic Car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Classic Car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Dealer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6389</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Dealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6389</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Classic Car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Classic Car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: French Cooking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4383</link>
		<dc:creator>French Cooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4383</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Dutch Oven Cooking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Dutch Oven Cooking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: French Cooking</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>French Cooking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Dutch Oven Cooking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Dutch Oven Cooking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirela</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>mirela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Very nice blog. It is very helpful. http://www.bignews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Very nice blog. It is very helpful. <a href="http://www.bignews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bignews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mirela</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>mirela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Very nice blog. It is very helpful. http://www.bignews.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Very nice blog. It is very helpful. <a href="http://www.bignews.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bignews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Ah, Martin, what &lt;EM&gt;am&lt;/EM&gt; I going to do with you?&#160; If you find the term &quot;weblogging&quot; distasteful (and I admit it is not particularly mellifluous), remember that the gerund &quot;blogging&quot; sounds even &lt;EM&gt;more&lt;/EM&gt; onomatopoeic than the noun blog --&#160;suggesting that you had a particularly bad stomach&#160;flu last night and went to bed hungry.&#160;&#160;&#160;
You&#039;ve been hanging around under-thirty-somethings for too long, it seems.&#160; &#160;If you were working on a traditional website, would you say that you were &quot;websiting&quot; last night?&#160; If you were writing a newspaper column, would you say you were &quot;newspapering&quot; or &quot;papering&quot; last night --&#160;much less&#160;&quot;columning&quot;?&#160;&#160; How about &quot;textbooking&quot;?&#160;&#160; If at home having an evening of leisure instead, would you say you were &quot;televisioning,&quot; &quot;movieing,&quot; &quot;refrigeratoring&quot;?&#160; 
The problem, as my&#160;questions above suggest,&#160;is the annoying modern habit of turning nouns -- even odious ones -- into verbs.&#160; Why don&#039;t you and I start our own crusade to rid the &lt;EM&gt;verbs&lt;/EM&gt; &quot;blog&quot; and &quot;weblog&quot; from our lexicon.&#160; Surely we could say we were writing, publishing, educating, commenting, or many other fine activities last night, since we were apparently&#160;both lucky enough to avoid stomach flu and binge drinking. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Ah, Martin, what <em>am</em> I going to do with you?&nbsp; If you find the term &#8220;weblogging&#8221; distasteful (and I admit it is not particularly mellifluous), remember that the gerund &#8220;blogging&#8221; sounds even <em>more</em> onomatopoeic than the noun blog &#8211;&nbsp;suggesting that you had a particularly bad stomach&nbsp;flu last night and went to bed hungry.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
You&#8217;ve been hanging around under-thirty-somethings for too long, it seems.&nbsp; &nbsp;If you were working on a traditional website, would you say that you were &#8220;websiting&#8221; last night?&nbsp; If you were writing a newspaper column, would you say you were &#8220;newspapering&#8221; or &#8220;papering&#8221; last night &#8211;&nbsp;much less&nbsp;&#8221;columning&#8221;?&nbsp;&nbsp; How about &#8220;textbooking&#8221;?&nbsp;&nbsp; If at home having an evening of leisure instead, would you say you were &#8220;televisioning,&#8221; &#8220;movieing,&#8221; &#8220;refrigeratoring&#8221;?&nbsp;<br />
The problem, as my&nbsp;questions above suggest,&nbsp;is the annoying modern habit of turning nouns &#8212; even odious ones &#8212; into verbs.&nbsp; Why don&#8217;t you and I start our own crusade to rid the <em>verbs</em> &#8220;blog&#8221; and &#8220;weblog&#8221; from our lexicon.&nbsp; Surely we could say we were writing, publishing, educating, commenting, or many other fine activities last night, since we were apparently&nbsp;both lucky enough to avoid stomach flu and binge drinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/comment-page-1/#comment-5771</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/10/the-ponds-frozen/#comment-5771</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Ah, Martin, what &lt;EM&gt;am&lt;/EM&gt; I going to do with you?&#160; If you find the term &quot;weblogging&quot; distasteful (and I admit it is not particularly mellifluous), remember that the gerund &quot;blogging&quot; sounds even &lt;EM&gt;more&lt;/EM&gt; onomatopoeic than the noun blog --&#160;suggesting that you had a particularly bad stomach&#160;flu last night and went to bed hungry.&#160;&#160;&#160;
You&#039;ve been hanging around under-thirty-somethings for too long, it seems.&#160; &#160;If you were working on a traditional website, would you say that you were &quot;websiting&quot; last night?&#160; If you were writing a newspaper column, would you say you were &quot;newspapering&quot; or &quot;papering&quot; last night --&#160;much less&#160;&quot;columning&quot;?&#160;&#160; How about &quot;textbooking&quot;?&#160;&#160; If at home having an evening of leisure instead, would you say you were &quot;televisioning,&quot; &quot;movieing,&quot; &quot;refrigeratoring&quot;?&#160; 
The problem, as my&#160;questions above suggest,&#160;is the annoying modern habit of turning nouns -- even odious ones -- into verbs.&#160; Why don&#039;t you and I start our own crusade to rid the &lt;EM&gt;verbs&lt;/EM&gt; &quot;blog&quot; and &quot;weblog&quot; from our lexicon.&#160; Surely we could say we were writing, publishing, educating, commenting, or many other fine activities last night, since we were apparently&#160;both lucky enough to avoid stomach flu and binge drinking. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Ah, Martin, what <em>am</em> I going to do with you?&nbsp; If you find the term &#8220;weblogging&#8221; distasteful (and I admit it is not particularly mellifluous), remember that the gerund &#8220;blogging&#8221; sounds even <em>more</em> onomatopoeic than the noun blog &#8211;&nbsp;suggesting that you had a particularly bad stomach&nbsp;flu last night and went to bed hungry.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br />
You&#8217;ve been hanging around under-thirty-somethings for too long, it seems.&nbsp; &nbsp;If you were working on a traditional website, would you say that you were &#8220;websiting&#8221; last night?&nbsp; If you were writing a newspaper column, would you say you were &#8220;newspapering&#8221; or &#8220;papering&#8221; last night &#8211;&nbsp;much less&nbsp;&#8221;columning&#8221;?&nbsp;&nbsp; How about &#8220;textbooking&#8221;?&nbsp;&nbsp; If at home having an evening of leisure instead, would you say you were &#8220;televisioning,&#8221; &#8220;movieing,&#8221; &#8220;refrigeratoring&#8221;?&nbsp;<br />
The problem, as my&nbsp;questions above suggest,&nbsp;is the annoying modern habit of turning nouns &#8212; even odious ones &#8212; into verbs.&nbsp; Why don&#8217;t you and I start our own crusade to rid the <em>verbs</em> &#8220;blog&#8221; and &#8220;weblog&#8221; from our lexicon.&nbsp; Surely we could say we were writing, publishing, educating, commenting, or many other fine activities last night, since we were apparently&nbsp;both lucky enough to avoid stomach flu and binge drinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
