<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: teasers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

D., I agree that both should be allowed in each other&#039;s tax-supported courses.  I wonder whether the either side would agreee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>D., I agree that both should be allowed in each other&#8217;s tax-supported courses.  I wonder whether the either side would agreee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-5802</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-5802</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

D., I agree that both should be allowed in each other&#039;s tax-supported courses.  I wonder whether the either side would agreee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>D., I agree that both should be allowed in each other&#8217;s tax-supported courses.  I wonder whether the either side would agreee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Michael, Why shouldn&#039;t both groups be allowed?&#160;&#160;How about just one good reason.&#160; Would allowing all to attend help or hinder the search for justice?
Gee, maybe we should start separating these two factions during law school.&#160;&#160; Or, perhaps, kindergarten.&#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Michael, Why shouldn&#8217;t both groups be allowed?&nbsp;&nbsp;How about just one good reason.&nbsp; Would allowing all to attend help or hinder the search for justice?<br />
Gee, maybe we should start separating these two factions during law school.&nbsp;&nbsp; Or, perhaps, kindergarten.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Michael, Why shouldn&#039;t both groups be allowed?&#160;&#160;How about just one good reason.&#160; Would allowing all to attend help or hinder the search for justice?
Gee, maybe we should start separating these two factions during law school.&#160;&#160; Or, perhaps, kindergarten.&#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Michael, Why shouldn&#8217;t both groups be allowed?&nbsp;&nbsp;How about just one good reason.&nbsp; Would allowing all to attend help or hinder the search for justice?<br />
Gee, maybe we should start separating these two factions during law school.&nbsp;&nbsp; Or, perhaps, kindergarten.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-3880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-3880</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Get over yourselves and your &quot;proprietary&quot;
tactics!&lt;/i&gt;

So, when prosecutors (using state tax dollars) host  training sessions for prosecutors, defense attorneys should also be admitted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p><i>Get over yourselves and your &#8220;proprietary&#8221;<br />
tactics!</i></p>
<p>So, when prosecutors (using state tax dollars) host  training sessions for prosecutors, defense attorneys should also be admitted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-5800</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Get over yourselves and your &quot;proprietary&quot;
tactics!&lt;/i&gt;

So, when prosecutors (using state tax dollars) host  training sessions for prosecutors, defense attorneys should also be admitted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p><i>Get over yourselves and your &#8220;proprietary&#8221;<br />
tactics!</i></p>
<p>So, when prosecutors (using state tax dollars) host  training sessions for prosecutors, defense attorneys should also be admitted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-3879</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-3879</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Lake Superior State University is on *my* banished list. So there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Lake Superior State University is on *my* banished list. So there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/02/25/teasers/comment-page-1/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/02/25/teasers/#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Lake Superior State University is on *my* banished list. So there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Lake Superior State University is on *my* banished list. So there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
