Comments on: charmed, i’m sure http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/03/02/charmed-im-sure/ breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Carolyn Elefant http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/03/02/charmed-im-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-3887 Carolyn Elefant Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:51:24 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/03/02/charmed-im-sure/#comment-3887 <a></a> Hi David: Well, I'm glad to see that we agree on one thing. The attorney's retainer agreement was completely outrageous. I simply cannot imagine how someone would think that he could include such a clause - it would be like a company denying a person the right to even go to arbitration over a defective product if they first complained to the Better Business Bureau. As for the Texas program, you're right - it's not mentoring which implies a give and take, longstanding relationship. But it really is a great educational resource notwithstanding the name of the program.

Hi David:

Well, I’m glad to see that we agree on one thing. The attorney’s retainer agreement was completely outrageous. I simply cannot imagine how someone would think that he could include such a clause – it would be like a company denying a person the right to even go to arbitration over a defective product if they first complained to the Better Business Bureau.

As for the Texas program, you’re right – it’s not mentoring which implies a give and take, longstanding relationship. But it really is a great educational resource notwithstanding the name of the program.

]]> By: Carolyn Elefant http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2005/03/02/charmed-im-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-5807 Carolyn Elefant Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:51:24 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2005/03/02/charmed-im-sure/#comment-5807 <a></a> Hi David: Well, I'm glad to see that we agree on one thing. The attorney's retainer agreement was completely outrageous. I simply cannot imagine how someone would think that he could include such a clause - it would be like a company denying a person the right to even go to arbitration over a defective product if they first complained to the Better Business Bureau. As for the Texas program, you're right - it's not mentoring which implies a give and take, longstanding relationship. But it really is a great educational resource notwithstanding the name of the program.

Hi David:

Well, I’m glad to see that we agree on one thing. The attorney’s retainer agreement was completely outrageous. I simply cannot imagine how someone would think that he could include such a clause – it would be like a company denying a person the right to even go to arbitration over a defective product if they first complained to the Better Business Bureau.

As for the Texas program, you’re right – it’s not mentoring which implies a give and take, longstanding relationship. But it really is a great educational resource notwithstanding the name of the program.

]]>