Because he is 78 years old, a lot of commentators seem to think that the new Pope, Benedict XVI, is likely to have a very short term, in a placeholder or interim papacy.
Norm Pattis at Crime & Federalism even penned a post calling him “Pope Rigor Mortis I,” and offering a long-distance, photographically-based, negative assessment of Benedict’s “intellectual vigor.” [Norm, there are a lot of octagenarians with intellectual vigor and a lot of brash younger folk without it. I’ve seen no sign that Joseph Ratzinger’s much-praised and prolific brain has been in decline.]growing old–
by the hearth’s light
piecework… ISSA , translated by David G. LanoueAlthough I’m hoping RiskProf Martin Grace will use his expertise and/or contacts to come up with more specific LE numbers for Benedict XVI, I’ve decided to do some quick research. I discovered:
- The average life expectancy of a male in the U.S. who lives to be
78 is 8.7 additional years. (National Vital Statistics Reports,Vol. 53, No.6, Nov. 10,2004, p. 16, Table 5).
- However, based on nationality, we might expect Benedict XVI to
have a slightly longer life expectancy, since the mortality tables show that the overall life expectancy in Germany, Joseph Ratzinger’s birthplace, is 77.4 years; and, in his most recent country of residency, Italy, it’s 79.0 years. The life expectancy in U.S.A. is lower — 77.1 years. [from U.S. Census Bureau’s International Data Base, via About.com geography page].Of course, there are other factors that might further prolong Benedict’s life expectancy and/or active lifespan:– education level– clean living– access to the very best health care (at no cost)– prayers of hundreds of millions of the faithful– divine interventionSo, as he has a job with no mandatory retirement age, those expecting Benedict XVI to be just a shooting star should probably choose a simile featuring a more-permanent heavenly body — and react, plan, celebrate, worry, etc., accordingly.
update (April 22, 2005): The gracious RiskProf has responded to our request for his expert opinion — giving his own musings on eternal life expectancies and ancient Romans. Martin also linked to an AP story that discusses the state of Pope Benedict’s health.the old priestdressed like a dandy —spring mountainnowhere, nowhere
can a young scarecrow
be foundmy old age–
even facing a scarecrow
ashamed… … ISSA , translated by David G. Lanoueby dagosan:
my long-lived elders —
a couple extra decades
of dementia
[April 20, 2005]
April 20, 2005
the new pope’s life expectancy
a scarecrow trio
The book The Scare Crow: A Collection of Haiku & Senryu (Leroy Kanterman, Ed., Hiroake Sato, translator, Red Moon Press, 1999), has dozens of wonderful haiku featuring the scarecrow, along with an essay “The Scarecrow and Our Haiku” by John Stevenson.
Here are three of the poems, written by a trio of f/k/a’s Honored Guests:
a cricket
lending the scarecrow
a voice
seeding time
the farmer dresses the same
as the scarecrow
tthe scarecrow
moving backwards —
autumn rain
For more, see scarecrow: yes, strawman: no (Aug. 26, 2005), and click for over 50 scarecrow haiku by Kobayashi Issa translated by David G. Lanoue
April 19, 2005
a different dog
shadow
among shadow–
the day begins cold
huge trees in the park —
a different dog
chasing the stick
sun & moon
in the same sky
the small hand of my wife
“huge trees in the park–” the heron’s nest (April 2001)
“shadow” – breathmarks: haiku to read in the dark
“sun & moon” Global Haiku: Twenty-Five Poets World-Wide
On April 8, 2005, the legal reform group HALT submitted comments to the
D.C. Bar Board of Governors concerning revisions to its Rules of Professional
Conduct. In addition to supporting further unbundling efforts and the continu-
ation of multidisciplinary practice, HALT suggests that Rule 1.2(a) further
clarify the primacy of the client’s decision-making in civil matters (similar to
criminal matters). HALT also proposed the following addition to Rule 1.5:
1.5(g) A lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge,
or collect a value based (or percentage) fee in a probate matter.
As for access, HALT urged the District “to recognize in the commentary to
Rule 1.2 that limited scope representation is but one of several ways to increase access
for legal consumers. Lawyers have an ethical responsibility to be familiar with other
low-cost options for consumers and to help their clients find and use resources
such as mediation and arbitration, self-help legal materials and Web sites, and
nontraditional legal service providers.” [Ed. note: Amen.] See the full set of
I wish I had seen this Word History for “pants” (from the American-
Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed., 2000), when writing about the scandalous
The abbreviation of pantaloons to pants met with some resistance
at first; it was considered vulgar and, as Oliver Wendell Holmes
[physicant-writer and dad of the famous jurist] put it, “a word
not made for gentlemen, but ‘gents.'”
I think Dr. Holmes would have gagged over the word “blog.”
In a Comment just posted, George Wallance was good enough to
remind us of the secret behind Albert Einstein’s hairdo: “Neglect!”
ron baker replies to “ethics aside”
Ron Baker, who has been described as “an amazing visionary” by Matt Homann, responded this morning to my piece “ethics aside”, where I caution lawyers against blindly adopting Baker’s notion of “value billing.” Ron, who complains that “The problem with these blogs is they are a mile wide and half-inch deep,” wants me to “commit some serious intellectual capital to this debate,” by reading his [$149.00] book. Well, I decided to respond right away, any way, and at some length. You can read the entire thread — the original post, Ron’s Comment, etc. — by clicking here, and you’re encouraged to add your comments.
Here’s a key excerpt from my response to Mr. Baker
I continue to believe, however, that clients want alternative billing methods in order to have lower overall fees, not because they believe their lawyer is worth more than his or her hourly fee.
p.s. Thanks go out to Ron Coleman of Likelihood of Confusion for including the post “ethics aside” in Blawg Review #2 yesterday. Ron even tried his hand at writing haiku, proving — on Clarence Darrow’s birthday — Darrow’s adage that “Inside every lawyer is the wreck of a poet.”
this world today–
for one chrysanthemum
a gold coin
spring rain–
in the window they haggle
over fish
spring rain–
in the wife’s sleeve
coins jingle– by Kobayashi Issa, translated by David G. Lanoue
April 18, 2005
haiku and the national pastime
After quickly polling the various editors of this weblog, I’ve
concluded that you do not have to be a baseball fan to enjoy
haiku about baseball. So, you’ll be finding the topic fairly often
here at f/k/a.
Here’s a pair from our clean-up hitter, George Swede:
crack of the bat
the outfielder circles
under the full moon
abandoned ballpark
gopher mound covers
home plate
George Swede from Almost Unseen (Brooks Books, 2000)
– plus, a benchwarmer’s contribution:
perfect line-drive
over second base —
coach says I swang late
dagosan [April 18, 2005]
“baseballg” As I discover them, I’ll be collecting
the baseball haiku of our Honored Guests at
law school applicants need homework
Sufflolk Law School Professor Andrew Perlman sent me off on quite
a tangent last week, with his guest posting at Legal Ethics Forum
on “Misleading Law School Promotional Materials” (April 13, 2005)
So, I thought I better at least get a posting out of it.
It seems Andy is worried that shady law school promotional tactics are
misleading and unfairly enticing the nation’s law school applicants. To avoid
hypocrisy and unpleasantly surprised students or graduates, Andy wants to apply
the same “strict” advertising criteria to schools that are applied to lawyers (although
he thinks the restrictions should be lifted from lawyers). I wasn’t sure that the
crisis was as big as Andy suggested, or that we should worry too much about
law school applicants (since they can and should protect themselves); check out
our conversation at LEF.
After doing a bit of research and reflection, I came to the following conclusions:
Naturally, it’s absolutely improper for law schools to be using deceptive
tactics in the admissions process [unless used to weed out particularly credulous
or lazy applicants!]
Standards for ABA-approved law schools already exist . . .
– click to read the entire post which opines:
“Given the existence and accessibility of this
information, the importance of the decisions,
and the kinds of skills and attitudes a good
lawyer needs, I cannot agree with Andy Perlman
that we should feel a lot of sympathy for “naive”
or ignorant law school applicants-turned-student.”
prairie twilight…
the glow of the cattleman’s
branding iron
Ed Markowski
during discussion
on the meaning of life . . . the crunch
of a student’s apple
George Swede
from Almost Unseen
pencil shavings
the student’s tongue
curls and uncurls
DeVar Dahl
from A New Resonance 3
Word for the Wise just had a great entry to honor the birthday
of Clarence Darrow (b. April 18, 1857), quoting him saying: “Inside
every lawyer is the wreck of a poet,” and presenting a poem by his
onetime law partner, poet Edgar Lee Masters entitled “Clarence Darrow.”
by dagosan:
a young man’s
erotic dream —
the old man’s bladder wakes him
[April 18, 2005]
admissions week —
two fat envelopes
and two skinny ones
[April 16, 2005]
it’s all relative, squared
Today is the fiftieth anniversary of Albert Einstein’s death (April 18, 1955).
I was five years old when he died, and have had no professional nor dilettante interest in physics
or mathematics. Nonetheless, I’ve always been very fond of Old Albert and have never quite
known why. Perhaps this quote from Sunday’s newspaper (Associated Press, April 15, 2005,
“100 Years Ago, Einstein Changed Everything,”) helps explain it:
“Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is
something, wearing stripes with plaid comes easy.”
“einsteinTime” I can picture it now: Little Tyke David proudly dresses himself one morning in
a color-and-design combination that provokes from his mother (and big sister) that phrase every
male in the universe hears, from every significant woman in his life (and quite a few insignificant
ones):
“That doesn’t go!” You can’t wear stripes with plaids! And, never mix green
with orange!”
Then, Mama Giacalone probaby added: “Do you want to look as silly as Albert Einstein?” Thus,
the bond was formed across the ages and the cosmos — like time, taste is relative.
That certainly explains my wearing stripes to visit the Einstein Monument in D.C. (1980) “Einstein head small”
orig photo by A.J. Giacalone here
Of course, there is much more to know, respect and like about the complex man chosen by
Time Magazine as Person of the Century (by Eric Golden, Jan. 3, 2005) — famous for his
genius and profundity, his charm and humor. Over the decades, as I have come to know some
very smart people who take themselves far too seriously, I’ve come to appreciate greatly Einstein’s
playfulness in public and his willingness to let the world see him being silly. His biographer
Juergen Neffe recently said, “He was the first global pop star of science at a time when world
stars were first emerging.” And:
“He was always fun to be with, always joking. Sometimes when he was supposed
to give a speech he would just play his violin instead.” (keralanext.com, April 14, 2005)
I think Albert would shake his shaggy head at Rolf Sinclair, the stuffy physicist who is
quoted in an AP article saying he despises the Einstein monument in D.C., because “It makes him
look like one of the Three Stooges reading his horoscope.” The 12-foot bronze depicts Einstein
gazing at his famous energy formula. Like myself, tourists of all ages climb on his lap for snapshots
and to peer at the map of the universe that is at his feet.
Lately, as more and more “believers” assert that only “peope of faith” can have a strong moral
code and sense of social responsibility (see my post, e.g., on religious law schools), Einstein the
humanist has been an inspiration for me. As Rabbi Sherwin Wine explains:
“Albert Einstein was an ardent humanist who believed that human power
and human responsibility were the foundations of the moral life. Einstein
maintained that ethical rules flowed from human experience and from the
requirements of human survival. While he stood in awe of the wonders of the
universe, he refused to worship them. He firmly believed that reality was no
more than the natural universe and that neither chance nor supernatural
intervention governed its events.”
Michael Dobkowski, professor of religious studies, Hobart and William Smith Colleges in
Geneva, NY. captured the feelings of myself and millions of others in America and around
the world (“Still today Albert Einstein models power of human spirit,” Rochester [NY]
Democrat & Chronicle, April 15, 2005):
“Einstein carried an unprecedented moral weight, and he took carefully
considered, courageous and even original stands on a host of issues. Great
social ideas and great science come from the ability to question the obvious,
and Einstein had an abiding incapacity for self-deception and evasion. So he
was willing to modify his positions to meet new realities.
– see Time for orig.
“His face, with its unruly, white hair and soft dreamy eyes has become, in many
ways, the human face of humanity and a reminder of the limitless potential of the
human spirit and intellect to overcome ignorance, prejudice, parochialism and the
dogma of uncontested assumptions.”
Let’s close with a few Einstein qutotations (from dailycelebrations.com):
Try not to become a man of success, but rather a man of value.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant.
We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts
can be counted.
Let every man be respected as an individual and no man idolized.
One final quote suggests that Einstein and Kobayashi Issa — two
wise, compassionate, and silly souls — would have enjoyed meeting over
a cup or two of tea or sake.
“A human being is a part of the whole, called by us Universe, a part
limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and
feelings as something separated from the rest – a kind of optical delusion
of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting
us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us.
Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle
of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its
beauty. Nobody is able to achieve this completely, but the striving for such
achievement is in itself a part of the liberation and a foundation for inner security.”
[quoted in H Eves Mathematical Circles Adieu (Boston 1977)]
frogs sing, roosters sing
the east
turns light
the mountain moon
gives the blossom thief
light
the round patches
the square patches…
snow floats away!
from Kobayashi Issa, translated by David G. Lanoue
April 17, 2005
it’s all relative pt. 1
Amish country
the deer beside the road
stare at us
a child’s art–
the tulips tower
over everything
leaves budding
a little girl
spinning in her dress
seeing it her way
it must have been lonely
living with me
“stevensonQuietN” John Stevenson from Quiet Enough
(Red Moon Press, 2004)
April 16, 2005
alice frampton encore
Until Alaska Alice graces the haiku world with more of her haiku, here’s an
encore from last June:
from Mom‘s to Dad’s
the clickity-clack
of suitcase wheels
moving day–
warm rain
on cardboard
new recipe . . .
the scent
of ink
in English-Language Haiku (Edited by Jim Kacian and Dee Evetts, Red Moon Press, 2003) .
by dagosan:
spring’s first mosquito
on my cheek —
the neighbor waives back
admissions week —
two fat envelopes
and two skinny ones
[April 16, 2005]
April 15, 2005
welcoming the DC Nats
Despite your Editor’s skepticism about giant urban revitalization projects,
such as major league sports stadiums (see local schmocal), I can’t help but
be excited that my former hometown, Washington, D.C., now has a new
baseball team — which won the franchise’s first home game last night (see
“Nationals grab glory on DC debut,” bbc.com; “Powerbrokers see more
than a game: opener mixes business, pleasure ,” WashPost, April 15, 2005).
I had just graduated from Georgetown U. when the last DC team fled for
Texas.
I’ve enlisted two basebase-loving haijin, Ed Markowski
and Tom Painting to help celebrate the occasion:
distant thunder
the home run hitter
drops a bunt
lightning…
i lose jeter’s pop-up
in a blaze of static
rainy night
a hole in the radio
where a ballgame should be
Ed Markwoski
“distant thunder” & “lightning…” – from games (pawEprint 78, Nov. 2004)
“spring rain” – Haiku Sun (Issue X, Jan. 2004)
moths circle
the stadium lights
seventh inning stretch
all day rain
on the playing field
a stray dog
the toddler
runs to third base
first
“moths circle” from A New Resonance 2: Emerging Voices
“the toddler” & “all day rain” – from the haiku chapbook piano practice
by dagosan:
squinting to see him —
another generation
sent to right field
[April 15, 2005]
p.s. Thanks to Paul David Mena, who contributed the following
haiku to this baseball lineup, as a Comment:
April chill —
Wakefield’s knuckleball
unhittable
bonus (April 17, 2005):
extra innings
a runner’s shadow
down the third base line
taxes and sycophants in athens
Like last year, I hereby declare this website a tax-whiner-free zone today. By coincidence,
while reading last night, I came upon the following brief description of the way they
“paid for Democracy” in ancient Athens, in Paul Woodruff’s little gem, First Democracy:
The Challenge of an Ancient Idea (Oxford Press, 2005):
“TaxDayN”
“The hard labor of slaves paid for just about everything in the ancient Mediterranean,
including democracy.”
“Throughout the period of democracy, wealthy residents of Athens
were subject to special levies, depending on their wealth and the needs
of the city. The richest 2 or 3 percent were expected to pay for the
religious festivals that gave Athens both a civic life and a public education.
These included dramatic performances. Citizens only, most often the super
rich, were expected to pay for the ships in the navy of Athens. Both military
and religious financial duties were known as liturgies; they were a source of
pride and fame to the rich. After performing a liturgy, you would be exempt
from further demands for a year, or, in the case of paying for ships, two years.
How were the donors selected? It was an honor to be asked to perform a
liturgy, but if you thought someone else was richer, and that he therefore should
be ahead of you in line to pay for a ship or a festival, you could challenge him in
court, either to exchange his wealth for yours or to take on the liturgy.”
- Clearly, this is not the kind of “liturgy” of which Prof. Bainbridge is fond.
Preska) think of the Popular Court of Athens, as described in First Democracy (at 50):
“The right to bring charges now emerges [circa 462 B.C.] as an important
democratic principle. Ordinary citizens could bring charges against leaders
of the government, and thereby make powerful people accountable to the
popular courts for their actions. Penalties for frivolous lawsuits were heavy,
however. If a prosecutor won less than one-fifth of the votes on his jury, he
would be punished by a heavy fine (1,000 drachmas).
“The right to bring charges had an unwanted consequence– easy blackmail.
Sycophants made a living by theatening law suits against people who could afford
to pay them off. Popular juries were unpredictable, and could be hostile to
aristocrats. To many aristocrats, and evn to ordinary people, sycophants were the
worse consequence of democracy.”
An interesting wrinkle that might please a lot of Americans: “There were no professionals
in the law. Any citizen could prosecute, and anyone who was brought to trial had to
defend himself.”
p.s. Woodruff’s call to get back to the original meaning of democracy — of the people and for
all the people (not just the majority) — is an important message. Woodruff admires the democratic
ideal “because it takes human imperfections into account better than any other ideal of government.”
His suggestions for making America more democratic in spirit and reality are worthy of discussion
in another post.
where there’s people
there’s flies
and Buddhas
people of the capital
in parasol shade
drinking sake
pure mountain water–
people coming and going
muddy it
– from Kobayashi Issa, translated by David G. Lanoue
April 14, 2005
he pedals faster
spring wind
he pedals
faster
spring-like day
the cat grapples
with a catnip bird
last of the sunlight
cows bounding
downhill
Carolyn Hall from The Heron’s Nest (Vo. VI, 2004)
“tinyredcheck” npr’s Morning Edition had a segment today (April 14, 2005) that was
inspiring — “Stanford Students Tutor Service Workers on Campus.”
The Habla la Noche program is “a student-run organization whose
mission is to increase English-language literacy among adult workers
on campus and to create a connection between campus workers and
students.”
Before he left on yet another vacation break, my weblog friend Martin
Grace was good enough to respond to our request for input on a poll
question concerning congressional veto over Supreme Court decisions.
Thanks, to the RiskProf for a thoughtful response. In passing, Martin
questioned my referring to the concept of “fundamentalist” Catholics.
A quick Google search for
600 results. The phrase seems to be used by liberal-to-moderate folk to
refer to ultra-conservative (darn-sure-they’re-right-about-what-God-
wants) Catholics.
The nonliberal Baptist preacher, Dr. Jack Hyles said “A fundamentalist
is one who believes in the faith and practice of the original purposes
and doctrines of an institution.” For him: ” If you follow the faith and
practice of the original intents of the Catholic church, you are a fundamentalist
Catholic and go back to [Constantine in] 313.” If Catholicism went back
even further — say to 33 A.D. — I might re-enlist.
In 1999, “French fundamentalist Catholic priest on trial” was the
headline for a BBC online news article.
And, Martin, don’t be so sure there aren’t Catholics who take the
seven-day creation story literally. I’ve met a couple.
We’re #4! Speaking of Googling, this website has turned up as the #4
result in a number of queries that ended up on my Refer page already this
month:
how does George Globe light his grill> #4 of over 69,000 in a
Yahoo search.
cafeteria Catholic> #4 of 209,000 in a Google search
Debt Reduction horror stories> #4 of 592,000 in Google Search
shaming> #4 of 229,000 in a Google search.
The #1 result for “cafeteria catholics” is a very derogatory webpage from
ConcernedCatholics.org. You’ll find a comparison to “lukewarm Catholics”
on the same page.
April 13, 2005
in praise of inside voices
moving day
the dogwood tree
in full white bloom
warm sea
we swim into the phosphorescence
lightly touching
oval frame
a woman curves
around her child
At LEF, Prof. Andy Perlman is fretting over misleading Law School Promotions.
At least one commentor is skeptical (guess who).
Yesterday, Bob Ambrogi alerted the blogosphere to the problem of censorware
blocking weblogs. He was shocked to learn that he was being blocked as an
“e-commerce” site that could possibly be a source of weapons and lingerie. Bob’s
Comment feature was not working today, so I could not remind him at his site, that
he did indeed have a lingerie ad on his website, back in October 2004, when he asked
whether weblawgs should use BlogAds. At the time, I left a Comment opining in the
negative, and noted that there was an ad for x-rated lingerie at the bottom of that very
It seemed mildly amusing in theory, when it was first announced last September
comprised of various Chewbacca vocalizations, have activated my curmudgeon gene.
How many times will I have to hear it before it stops being cute? (less than 3, I bet)
Speaking of common courtesy, you can click for words and audio of Geoff Johnson’s
song “Inside Voice.”
“tinyredcheck” At his Legal Ethics [We]Blog today, Ben Cowgill focuses on the “substantial
growth in non-meritorious bar complaints” in Kentucky between 1998 and 2003. Check out
the comments for my argument that the numbers don’t look very significant, and the focus in
Kentucky should be on improving the bar discipline system from its 48th place finish in HALT’s
2002 Report Card.
April 12, 2005
papa’s fiddle
spring cleaning
leaving the rosin
on papa’s fiddle
first tree buds
the list of baby names
not chosen
cutting biscuits
spring sun
through the blinds
“spring cleaning” tiny words (March 15, 2004)
“first tree buds” tiny words (March 10, 2004)
“cutting biscuits” tiny words (March 30, 2004)
The lastest edition of the Harvard Law Bulletin (Spring 2005) features a
cover that reads “Giving Back: Harvard Law School wants all lawyers to get involved in
public service.” I recommend “Sowing the seeds of public service at HLS”, as well as
the HLS pro bono requirement, its purpose, and the flexible ways it can be fulfilled. The
program, which apparently helps attract some of the very best students, hopes to make
even the most skeptical student see how fulfilling it can be to make public service a part
of your life (by following your bliss). There are some good anecdotes.
I was surprised to read about the comprehensiveness of the
HLS Low Income Protection Plan — as you can see from
this chart, it offers loan help to any alumnus who makes less
than $87,000 and still has student loan debt (expecting an
annual contribution of $0 toward loan payments, if you make
$37,000 or less). Any fulltime job for a non-profit, governmental,
or educational entity is eligible for the program and — this
will make Carolyn‘s heart beat fast — so are law-related jobs in
the private sector (like at small law firms or firms in locations that
are less desirable geographically). What a difference this would
have made for me back in 1976!
The Ask the Professor feature of the Spring 2005 edition of the Harvard Law
Bulletin asked HLS Professor David Barron, an expert on local government law, to explain
what’s at stake in the U.S. Supreme Court’s pending case, Kelo v. City of New London, and
what he thinks the Court should do. Here’s part of Prof. Barron’s reply:
“By affirming New London’s exercise of the power of eminent domain on
the ground that it constitutes a legitimate land-use planning effort, the Court
would protect private property rights and provide a check against cities using
takings as simply a fiscal tool. Tying a planning requirement to the ‘public use’
test would stimulate local government planning because, whenever a transfer
of the condemned land to a private party was involved, the taking could pass
muster only when it was part of a real urban land-use plan.”
Ben Cowgill at the Legal Ethics [We]Blog, gives “Congratulations to Carolyn Elefant
of MyShingle.com for well-deserved recognition in JD Bliss, the on-line journal devoted
to ‘balancing life and law’.” See “Success Story: Carolyn Elefant: How to Go Solo” at
JD Bliss. Ben credits Carolyn’s weblog and leadership for helping to forge new kinds
of networking between and among solo practitioners. Ben and Carolyn have been using
the term “independent practitioners” to describe this new breed of lawyers. In true Yabut
fashion, I have left a Comment at Ben’s palce, asking for more helpful terminology. Please
leave your suggestions, too.
As usual, Bob Ambrogi points today to an interesting new website — this time, it’s Patricia
M. Dugan’s ElectaPope.com, at which the “practicing Catholic canon lawyer and civil lawyer”
has collected lots of information on the process and history of papal selection (and more).
Since Prof. Yabut was feeling cranky again today, he pointed out the use by
Lawyer Dugan of one of his least favorite phrases: In her Bio, Dugan claims she is
“one of the only” laywomen to ever hold both degrees. Prof. Y has always thought
the phrase should be used only by lazy reporters on short deadlines. When
confronted by the term, Alfred M. Kriman at Stammtisch Beau Fleuve asks:
“Which one of the only?” We add “what’s an only?”
The SBF site also explains that “one of my favorite” is the:
“Diplomatic declension of ‘my favorite’.”
And, “one size fits all” means: We don’t have your size.
Evan Bling-Bling Schaeffer just saved me time and money with his review of Justice
magazine. Thanks, Evan, but aren’t you being too hard on morons?