f/k/a . . .

May 2, 2005

towards a better Law Day

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:13 pm

If bar leaders are inspired by Ben Cowgill’s excellent post today proposing that

lawyers use Law Day for “self examination, not self-congratulation,” I have some 

projects to suggest for them.  Of course, we should be working on them every day:


tiny check Instead of blocking efforts to make Small Claims courts meaningful

(with higher dollar limits), consumer-friendly and effective, lead the fight to

bring small claims into the 21st Century.  (See HALT’s small claims project

and my SuperSize Small Claims article.)

 

scales rich poor neg  Realize that pro bono will never be adequate to get legal services

to the poor and that improving self-help resources (both for litigation and

transactional legal needs) is the only meaningful way to make access a

reality.  See our post on NY’s doomed pro bono efforts, where we said:


Bar associations who are serious about improving access to the

legal system could help fund, tailor and produce, in their own states

and locales, self-help programs similar to the online and courthouse

resources available in California and Nevada,   Local bar groups

could also recruit and train volunteers for hands-on assistance in

programs similar to those in Duluth, MN, and Santa Clara, CA. [plus 

Portsmouth, MA], where lawyers help persons with legal problems

represent themselves.  Much more can and must be done.

“tinyredcheck”  Acknowledge, as the New Hampshire have done in Challenge to Justice

(Jan. 2004)  that every member of the public — not merely the poor – has

the right to represent himself or herself in our courts, whenever that is feasible,

and “Our obligation is to give these citizens the help they want, need and deserve.”

(see our post)




  • NYSBA’s brochure telling the public “he who represents himself

    has a fool for a client,” and the Massachusett’s Bar Ass’n insisting

    every litigant needs a lawyer just will not do.




  • Which reminds me of the quote from Edward Day Parsons: “He who

    pleads his own case may have a fool for a client; but it’s more probable

    that he who employs a lawyer will have a knave for an attorney.”

tiny check  Make “unbundling” an effective tool for making legal services cost-effective  scales rich poor

and allowing consumers a more central role in solving their own legal problems.

(e.g., get necessary rules and sample agreements in place, and tell the public

about the concept)

 

tiny check  Stop the phony and annoying public relations campaigns.  Spend the money

instead on improved self-help technology.

 

tiny check  Improve Lawyer Referral Services — in most states, they do little more than

give consumers the next name on the list, with no more information than you

can find in the phone book. 

 

tiny check  Get more nonlawyers on your disciplinary panels.  See HALT’s accountability

project.

 

SolLinowitz Read about and emulate Sol Linowitz.

That should hold you for suggestions, but feel free to email me for more.  Meanwhile,

let me leave you with two quotes: a


If it weren’t for lawyers, we wouldn’t need them.

                                       Williams Jennings Bryan

                                            [click for a cartoon concurrence by Wiley] 

 

Ninety percent of our lawyers serve 10 percent of our people. We are

over-lawyered and under-represented.

                                            Jimmy Carter

 

p.s.  Does any one know why the White House hasn’t issued a Law Day proclamation this

year?  Or did I miss it?  Last year, Pres. Bush did issue such a proclamation, on April 30,

2004.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

towards a better Law Day

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 3:15 pm

If bar leaders are inspired by Ben Cowgill’s excellent post today proposing that lawyers use Law Day for “self examination, not self-congratulation,” I have some projects to suggest for them.  Of course, we should be working on them every day:
tiny check Instead of blocking efforts to make Small Claims courts meaningful
(with higher dollar limits), consumer-friendly and effective, lead the fight to
bring small claims into the 21st Century.  (See HALT’s small claims project
and my SuperSize Small Claims article.)
scales rich poor neg  Because pro bono will never be adequate to get legal services
to the poor, start improving self-help resources (both for litigation and
transactional legal needs), which are the only meaningful way to make access a
reality.  See our post on NY’s doomed pro bono efforts, where we said:
Bar associations who are serious about improving access to the
legal system could help fund, tailor and produce, in their own states
and locales, self-help programs similar to the online and courthouse
resources available in California and Nevada,   Local bar groups
could also recruit and train volunteers for hands-on assistance in
programs similar to those in Duluth, MN, and Santa Clara, CA. [plus 
Portsmouth, MA], where lawyers help persons with legal problems
represent themselves.  Much more can and must be done.
HelpWantedG Acknowledge, as the New Hampshire have done in Challenge to Justice
(Jan. 2004)  that every member of the public — not merely the poor – has
the right to represent himself or herself in our courts, whenever that is feasible.
“Our obligation is to give these citizens the help they want, need and deserve.”
(see our post)
  • NYSBA’s brochure telling the public “he who represents himself
    has a fool for a client,” and the Massachusett’s Bar Ass’n insisting
    every litigant needs a lawyer just will not do.
  • Which reminds me of the quote from Edward Day Parsons: “He who
    pleads his own case may have a fool for a client; but it’s more probable
    that he who employs a lawyer will have a knave for an attorney.”
scales rich poor  Make “unbundling” an effective tool for making legal services cost-
effective  and allowing consumers a more central role in solving their own legal problems.
(e.g., get necessary rules and sample agreements in place, and tell the public about
the concept) Associations and individual lawyers should check out this example.
tiny check  Stop the phony and annoying public relations campaigns.  Spend the money
instead on improved self-help technology.
tiny check  Improve Lawyer Referral Services — in most states, they do little more than
give consumers the next name on the list, with no more information than you
can find in the phone book. 
tiny check  Get more nonlawyers on your disciplinary panels.  See HALT’s accountability
project.
SolLinowitz Read about and emulate Sol Linowitz.

That should hold you for suggestions, but feel free to email me for more.  Meanwhile, let me leave you with two quotes: 

If it weren’t for lawyers, we wouldn’t need them.
                                       Williams Jennings Bryan
                                            [click for a cartoon concurrence
Ninety percent of our lawyers serve 10 percent of our people. We are
over-lawyered and under-represented.
                                            Jimmy Carter

p.s.  It’s pretty plain that the White House considers May 1st to be Law Day — the word ‘lawyer’

doesn’t appear in this year’s proclamation or press release.”  (Apri. 29, 2005)  [Thanks to  E .Eversman

for the pointer.]

2 Comments »

  1. David, yes, Pres. Bush did issue a proclamation regarding Law Day. He issued it on Friday, April 29th. The PDF copy is at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/05-9031.pdf

    Weirdly, Bush also proclaimed May 1st to be “Loyalty Day”, a day to celebrate loyalty to our country. May 1st? Do you think he was aware of the implications of making May Day the new Loyalty Day? Is this communist America now? Or, perhaps, more aptly, is this totalitarian America now?

    You can see the Loyalty Day PDF here:
    http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/05-9032.pdf

    Comment by E L Eversman — May 4, 2005 @ 5:11 pm

  2. David, yes, Pres. Bush did issue a proclamation regarding Law Day. He issued it on Friday, April 29th. The PDF copy is at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/05-9031.pdf

    Weirdly, Bush also proclaimed May 1st to be “Loyalty Day”, a day to celebrate loyalty to our country. May 1st? Do you think he was aware of the implications of making May Day the new Loyalty Day? Is this communist America now? Or, perhaps, more aptly, is this totalitarian America now?

    You can see the Loyalty Day PDF here:
    http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/pdf/05-9032.pdf

    Comment by E L Eversman — May 4, 2005 @ 5:11 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress

Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress