Summer 2005 edition of the Harvard Law Bulletin arrived really
late — because, I swear, it was stuffed in my mailbox today, along
with the December 2005 edition of Washington [DC] Lawyer. [update:
8 PM: sorting through the rest of my mail, I found an invitation to
a museum opening scheduled for Sept. 18, 2005, and an AARP
life insurance offer that needed a response by Oct. 4. It seems
I'm not going crazy -- the Summer edition of HLB really did arrive
today.]
I first looked through Washington Lawyer, and was pleased to see
and also a column by DC Bar President John C. Cruden on the topic.
I hope this coverage will encourage government managers and individual
staffers at all levels of government to expand and encourage participation
in pro bono programs. (My pro bono work almost three decades ago was
so satisfying that it got me to leave government and antitrust and focus
on mediation and children’s advocacy.)
Inspired by the Washington Lawyer pieces, I was discouraged by what 
I saw in the Alumni Letters section of the Harvard Law Bulletin. In response
to articles in the Spring 2005 HLB, and particularly its backcover, there was
this Letter from HLS student Aaron S. Kaufman (Class of 2006):
The Other Side Uncovered
I am somewhat upset about the back cover of the Spring 2005
issue of the Harvard Law Bulletin, with the full-page photo of Suma
Nair and the quote, “I’m glad there is a pro bono requirement. It brought
me back to why I came here in the first place.”
It misrepresents the views of most law students who very much resent
the law school telling us that we must work a certain number of hours
pro bono. Pro bono is supposed to be something that a lawyer wants to
do, not something that is imposed on us as a prerequisite to graduation.
While I doubt, for political reasons, that you’re going to put a full-page
picture of me on the back of the Bulletin saying, “I truly resent the pro
bono requirement,” I would appreciate if you make some sort of apology
or emphasize that Ms. Nair’s views are atypical. Or at the very least,
please present views on the other side of the issue.
Aaron S. Kaufman ‘06
Cambridge, Mass.
f/k/a covered the Giving Back edition of HLB here, where we noted:
cover that reads “Giving Back: Harvard Law School wants all lawyers
to the practice of public service, which describe the HLS pro bono require-
ment, its purpose, and the flexible ways it can be fulfilled. The program,
which apparently helps attract some of the very best students, hopes to
make even the most skeptical student see how fulfilling it can be to make
public service a part of your life (by following your bliss). There are some
good anecdotes.
I hope the skeptical and “somewhat upset” Mr.Kaufman has mellowed on this
topic.
small town news
just enough paper
to cover the wino
city sunset
two men prowl the ruins
of a burned out house
thunder
the migrant workers
never look up
laid off
she asks the mall santa to
bring dad a job
p.s. Do you think it is deceptive for a solo practitioner to call
his or her law practice a “firm”? How about calling it “The Law
Offices of . ..”? See this article in Washington Lawyer, and
the rookie cop rousts
an old hobo —
feeding plump pigeons