<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a few more words on eschewing &#8220;blawg&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Denise Howell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Thanks, and likewise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Thanks, and likewise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Howell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-6753</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-6753</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Thanks, and likewise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Thanks, and likewise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Hi, Denise,&#160; Thank you for your explanation.&#160; As you know, you&#039;re still one of my favorite webiverse denizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Hi, Denise,&nbsp; Thank you for your explanation.&nbsp; As you know, you&#8217;re still one of my favorite webiverse denizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Hi, Denise,&#160; Thank you for your explanation.&#160; As you know, you&#039;re still one of my favorite webiverse denizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Hi, Denise,&nbsp; Thank you for your explanation.&nbsp; As you know, you&#8217;re still one of my favorite webiverse denizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Howell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Greetings David,

No insult (veiled or otherwise) intended, just my reaction to something I see as inversely proportionate in importance to the volume of attention it receives.  The post was meant as humorous.  (If I&#039;d wanted to be both humorous and insulting, I might have gone for something more like the wrap-up of this:  http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)  Re linking, the benefit of pointing to the searches I did was that anyone interested can find a better collection of on-topic posts there than anything I was willing to put together.  All I know is you, Kevin, and Ed. have each done several posts; I would have had to track them all down, and still exclude others who have commented if I wasn&#039;t willing to do yet more work.  (Technorati&#039;s tools offer an exceptionally welcome alternative to this kind of mindnumbing and time-gobbliing effort.) I also knew readers would be sent your way from the LL posts to which I linked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Greetings David,</p>
<p>No insult (veiled or otherwise) intended, just my reaction to something I see as inversely proportionate in importance to the volume of attention it receives.  The post was meant as humorous.  (If I&#8217;d wanted to be both humorous and insulting, I might have gone for something more like the wrap-up of this:  <a href="http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)" rel="nofollow">http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)</a>  Re linking, the benefit of pointing to the searches I did was that anyone interested can find a better collection of on-topic posts there than anything I was willing to put together.  All I know is you, Kevin, and Ed. have each done several posts; I would have had to track them all down, and still exclude others who have commented if I wasn&#8217;t willing to do yet more work.  (Technorati&#8217;s tools offer an exceptionally welcome alternative to this kind of mindnumbing and time-gobbliing effort.) I also knew readers would be sent your way from the LL posts to which I linked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Howell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing-blawg/comment-page-1/#comment-6751</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/01/31/a-few-more-words-on-eschewing#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Greetings David,

No insult (veiled or otherwise) intended, just my reaction to something I see as inversely proportionate in importance to the volume of attention it receives.  The post was meant as humorous.  (If I&#039;d wanted to be both humorous and insulting, I might have gone for something more like the wrap-up of this:  http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)  Re linking, the benefit of pointing to the searches I did was that anyone interested can find a better collection of on-topic posts there than anything I was willing to put together.  All I know is you, Kevin, and Ed. have each done several posts; I would have had to track them all down, and still exclude others who have commented if I wasn&#039;t willing to do yet more work.  (Technorati&#039;s tools offer an exceptionally welcome alternative to this kind of mindnumbing and time-gobbliing effort.) I also knew readers would be sent your way from the LL posts to which I linked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Greetings David,</p>
<p>No insult (veiled or otherwise) intended, just my reaction to something I see as inversely proportionate in importance to the volume of attention it receives.  The post was meant as humorous.  (If I&#8217;d wanted to be both humorous and insulting, I might have gone for something more like the wrap-up of this:  <a href="http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)" rel="nofollow">http://www.wordlab.com/2006/01/dont-panic.cfm.)</a>  Re linking, the benefit of pointing to the searches I did was that anyone interested can find a better collection of on-topic posts there than anything I was willing to put together.  All I know is you, Kevin, and Ed. have each done several posts; I would have had to track them all down, and still exclude others who have commented if I wasn&#8217;t willing to do yet more work.  (Technorati&#8217;s tools offer an exceptionally welcome alternative to this kind of mindnumbing and time-gobbliing effort.) I also knew readers would be sent your way from the LL posts to which I linked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
