Comments on: too much to read, too much to write http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/ breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: E L Eversman http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-4964 E L Eversman Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:21:57 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-4964 <a></a> Of course, if typos count, then you're right, I am.

Of course, if typos count, then you’re right, I am.

]]> By: E L Eversman http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6884 E L Eversman Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:21:57 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-6884 <a></a> Of course, if typos count, then you're right, I am.

Of course, if typos count, then you’re right, I am.

]]> By: E L Eversman http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-4963 E L Eversman Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:19:48 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-4963 <a></a> Sadly, not timely in getting around to reading all of the things I should -- the old "to do list" you mentioned being too long as it is. Your post, David, sharply criticizes something I posted that ran in Blawg Review #46. Yet, you flatly say in that entry you won't take the time to comment on what aggravates you about my post; you discuss how beneficial comments can be to the overall discourse of a blog; but you didn't voice your criticism of my entry in any comments on my blog. I wish you would have. After all, I just might have learned something from a former antitrust lawyer who spent a lot of time trying to get rid of the MFA. If you had submitted a comment, and given the opportunity for some dialogoue, you might have been pleasantly surprised to discover that I am not nearly as much of an idiot as you suggest.

Sadly, not timely in getting around to reading all of the things I should — the old “to do list” you mentioned being too long as it is.

Your post, David, sharply criticizes something I posted that ran in Blawg Review #46. Yet, you flatly say in that entry you won’t take the time to comment on what aggravates you about my post; you discuss how beneficial comments can be to the overall discourse of a blog; but you didn’t voice your criticism of my entry in any comments on my blog. I wish you would have. After all, I just might have learned something from a former antitrust lawyer who spent a lot of time trying to get rid of the MFA.

If you had submitted a comment, and given the opportunity for some dialogoue, you might have been pleasantly surprised to discover that I am not nearly as much of an idiot as you suggest.

]]> By: E L Eversman http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6883 E L Eversman Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:19:48 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-6883 <a></a> Sadly, not timely in getting around to reading all of the things I should -- the old "to do list" you mentioned being too long as it is. Your post, David, sharply criticizes something I posted that ran in Blawg Review #46. Yet, you flatly say in that entry you won't take the time to comment on what aggravates you about my post; you discuss how beneficial comments can be to the overall discourse of a blog; but you didn't voice your criticism of my entry in any comments on my blog. I wish you would have. After all, I just might have learned something from a former antitrust lawyer who spent a lot of time trying to get rid of the MFA. If you had submitted a comment, and given the opportunity for some dialogoue, you might have been pleasantly surprised to discover that I am not nearly as much of an idiot as you suggest.

Sadly, not timely in getting around to reading all of the things I should — the old “to do list” you mentioned being too long as it is.

Your post, David, sharply criticizes something I posted that ran in Blawg Review #46. Yet, you flatly say in that entry you won’t take the time to comment on what aggravates you about my post; you discuss how beneficial comments can be to the overall discourse of a blog; but you didn’t voice your criticism of my entry in any comments on my blog. I wish you would have. After all, I just might have learned something from a former antitrust lawyer who spent a lot of time trying to get rid of the MFA.

If you had submitted a comment, and given the opportunity for some dialogoue, you might have been pleasantly surprised to discover that I am not nearly as much of an idiot as you suggest.

]]> By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-4885 David Giacalone Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:57:20 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-4885 <a></a> Yes, a Comment can indeed be a tip, and I wish more folks could take the time to Comment, as you often do. Of course, a Comment can also be the tip an iceberg -- or of a knife.

Yes, a Comment can indeed be a tip, and I wish more folks could take the time to Comment, as you often do. Of course, a Comment can also be the tip an iceberg — or of a knife.

]]> By: David Giacalone http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6805 David Giacalone Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:57:20 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-6805 <a></a> Yes, a Comment can indeed be a tip, and I wish more folks could take the time to Comment, as you often do. Of course, a Comment can also be the tip an iceberg -- or of a knife.

Yes, a Comment can indeed be a tip, and I wish more folks could take the time to Comment, as you often do. Of course, a Comment can also be the tip an iceberg — or of a knife.

]]> By: Kevin Heller http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-4884 Kevin Heller Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:46:38 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-4884 <a></a> Several good points. Thanks David. a comment is yet another way to tip for good service

Several good points. Thanks David.

a comment is yet
another way to tip
for good service

]]> By: Kevin Heller http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-write/comment-page-1/#comment-6804 Kevin Heller Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:46:38 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/formerlyknownas/2006/02/28/too-much-to-read-too-much-to-#comment-6804 <a></a> Several good points. Thanks David. a comment is yet another way to tip for good service

Several good points. Thanks David.

a comment is yet
another way to tip
for good service

]]>