Since 2006 began, I’ve been forgetting to update my favorite SideBar feature —
The Inadvertent Searchee. In a week when your Editor has been accused of being
old and over the hill, intellectually lazy, and — gasp! — a writer of both gibberish and
poetry, I’m happy to make up for that neglect with a few new entries. They suggest
that the major search engines like us a lot more than p/i lawyers do:
weblog culture> #1 and #2 of 44,500,000 Google results went to our page
on Weblog Culture & Ethics page.
As for legal profession issues dear to our heart and important
to consumers:
lawyer client self fool> We had the #2 and #3 of 1.6 million results in this
Google query. In one post, we spoke of George Fool in the Forest Wallace and
self-regulation on the same page. In the other, we quoted a NYSBA brochure
that was discouraging self-help by consumers. Google should have featured
our quote from Edward Day Parsons:
“He who pleads his own case may have a fool for a client; but it’s
more probable that he who employs a lawyer will have a knave for
an attorney.”
lawyer value billing> The first two results out of 17 million in this Google search.
came from f/k/a (the internet’s lone voice of caution on this issue). For example,
see Value Billing and Legal Ethics — honest, guys, clients want to pay less,
not more, in lawyer fees when they seek better value.
not
What Is An Appropriate Contingency Fee> The first two of nearly 4 million results
certain dignified p/i lawyer). Now, if only the good-guy tort lawyers would read
up and take it too heart.
lawyer telling clients when they are damned fools> The first two of almost half a
million Google results came from f/k/a, for this very important concept. We
were quoting Sol Sol Linowitz‘s book Betrayed Profession:
“Elihu Root . . . put the matter more simply: ‘About
half the practice of a decent lawyer,’ he once said,
‘consists in telling would-be clients that they are
damned fools and should stop.’
“Today there are too few lawyers who see it as
part of their function to tell clients (especially new
clients) that they are damned fools and should stop:
Any such statement would interfere with the marketing
program. The public pays, because the rule of law is
diminished.”
fiduciary obligations of attorneys> #1 of 2.5 million Google results, on
a topic that doesn’t get enough discussion in the legal profession, was
this post, which focused on the obligation to better inform clients when
setting fees.
Of course, some of the search engine results seem to be a bit inadvertent
(or inauspicious):
haiku perspiration> #4 of 15,000 in the Google search,
which lets me repeat the poem in question from my alter
ego dagosan:
perspiration rolls
across flat abs —
her innie
Stop buying expensive coffee and save> #3 of 3.8 million Google results
was our commentary about law students spending far too much on luxuries
and adding needlessly to their law school debt. (Sometimes, we sound like
old fuddy-duddiesaround here.)
how big is a F cup> #1 of almost 9 million Yahoo! search results.
As usual, old Master Issa is the culprit (along with the “f” in our name):
evening
in a big sake cup.
moon and a flea
We were only the 9th result for men with spiked hair>, but it’s a good
excuse to re-post two ed markowski follicle poems:
late day showers…
my hair gel
reactivates
owen wilson erection in speedo> – Yesterday, we were #1 out of 309 in this
Yahoo query. That’s what I get for featuring the book Taboo Haiku. Go here
to see the provoking poems. [Oddly, the same Yahoo! search today doesn’t
even show f/k/a in the top 40. Talk about inconsistent performance.]
update (5 PM, March 24): I don’t know who’s looking up halloween sex> in
March, but our post on pols vs. sex offenders was the #2 result out of 5.3 million
in a Yahoo! Search today. Meanwhile, our own attempts to find out more about
the Smith v. Peterson “early bather” case, revealed that the f/k/a post of the subject
is the #1 result when Googling “Sheldon Smith” lawyer>.
just one glass of wine
Google keeps asking
“Did you mean _____?”
blind date tomorrow —
will she
Yahoo! me tonight?
March 24, 2006
inadvertent neglect
Comments Off on inadvertent neglect
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.