<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: softpornEsq and the 1st Am: is Prof. Volokh fantasizing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof-volokh-fantasizing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof-volokh-fantasizing/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof-volokh-fantasizing/comment-page-1/#comment-169351</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof#comment-169351</guid>
		<description>It seems, as we progress further into the abyss called Justice, that ethics violations have become more frequent. Should these numbers not, as a progressive society, be declining?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems, as we progress further into the abyss called Justice, that ethics violations have become more frequent. Should these numbers not, as a progressive society, be declining?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof-volokh-fantasizing/comment-page-1/#comment-21081</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof#comment-21081</guid>
		<description>The ethical questions are interesting. The haiku delight me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethical questions are interesting. The haiku delight me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The SC Employment Law Blog &#187; &#187; Blawg Review #104</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof-volokh-fantasizing/comment-page-1/#comment-21036</link>
		<dc:creator>The SC Employment Law Blog &#187; &#187; Blawg Review #104</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/14/softpornesq-and-the-1st-am-is-prof#comment-21036</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed. wants you to know about this post from David Giacalone. What can I say? It&#8217;s more like a law review article than a blog post and my eyesight isn&#8217;t that great. The haiku&#8217;s nice. Again with the not getting what the big human deal is about the topic thing. Again: dog. Still, nice post. (Tall One just popped in and has this to say: &#8220;Put your glasses on and read it. It&#8217;s an awesome piece, and I agree it&#8217;s not as cut and dried as Volokh may have made it seem, in practical terms. In idealistic terms: the hell?!?! Of course it doesn&#8217;t matter!&#8221; So - there you go. And &#8230; there Tall One goes, out the door again, beach chair and suntan lotion in hand. Y&#8217;all, I think I&#8217;ve been Punk&#8217;d.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed. wants you to know about this post from David Giacalone. What can I say? It&#8217;s more like a law review article than a blog post and my eyesight isn&#8217;t that great. The haiku&#8217;s nice. Again with the not getting what the big human deal is about the topic thing. Again: dog. Still, nice post. (Tall One just popped in and has this to say: &#8220;Put your glasses on and read it. It&#8217;s an awesome piece, and I agree it&#8217;s not as cut and dried as Volokh may have made it seem, in practical terms. In idealistic terms: the hell?!?! Of course it doesn&#8217;t matter!&#8221; So &#8211; there you go. And &#8230; there Tall One goes, out the door again, beach chair and suntan lotion in hand. Y&#8217;all, I think I&#8217;ve been Punk&#8217;d.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
