<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: around here silence is for driving not grieving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/24/around-here-silence-is-for-driving-not-grieving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/24/around-here-silence-is-for-driving-not-grieving/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shhh&#8230; Silence on Scavenger Saturday &#183; 2k Bloggers - The Face of the Blogosphere (a blog of bloggers blogging)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/24/around-here-silence-is-for-driving-not-grieving/#comment-22354</link>
		<dc:creator>Shhh&#8230; Silence on Scavenger Saturday &#183; 2k Bloggers - The Face of the Blogosphere (a blog of bloggers blogging)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/24/around-here-silence-is-for-driving#comment-22354</guid>
		<description>[...] f/k/a, David, will not be participating and wrote,  &#8220;respecting the good intentions of others and their mode of expressing grief, dissent, or support, does not require instantly adopting their suggestions and passing them around the internet. We each get to say, or at least ask ourselves: Does that make sense? For me? Is it likely to be effective? Are there better ways to make the point effectively?&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] f/k/a, David, will not be participating and wrote,  &#8220;respecting the good intentions of others and their mode of expressing grief, dissent, or support, does not require instantly adopting their suggestions and passing them around the internet. We each get to say, or at least ask ourselves: Does that make sense? For me? Is it likely to be effective? Are there better ways to make the point effectively?&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
