<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: in the eye of the bar-holder</title>
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/</link>
	<description>"breathless punditry" and "one-breath poetry" with David Giacalone</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-171944</link>
		<author>David Giacalone</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-171944</guid>
		<description>We were not involved in the case.  As suggested, above, the Florida Bar leadership demonstrated just how subjective and arbitrary their complaints really are.  Panthers are apparently dignified animals, and ethically appropriate, while pit bulls are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were not involved in the case.  As suggested, above, the Florida Bar leadership demonstrated just how subjective and arbitrary their complaints really are.  Panthers are apparently dignified animals, and ethically appropriate, while pit bulls are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tampa Injury Law</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-171920</link>
		<author>Tampa Injury Law</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-171920</guid>
		<description>What was the final outcome of this case? Were you able to keep your Panther logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the final outcome of this case? Were you able to keep your Panther logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appealing in Nevada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-22292</link>
		<author>Appealing in Nevada</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/04/25/in-the-eye-of-the-bar-holder/#comment-22292</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Has Anyone Tried Sharks?...&lt;/strong&gt;

An amusing account of the Florida Bar Association&#8217;s acceptance of lions and, after some misgivings, panthers, as appropriates animals for inclusion in law firm &#160;logos, but its determined&#160; rejection of the pit bull for the same purpose, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Has Anyone Tried Sharks?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An amusing account of the Florida Bar Association&rsquo;s acceptance of lions and, after some misgivings, panthers, as appropriates animals for inclusion in law firm &nbsp;logos, but its determined&nbsp; rejection of the pit bull for the same purpose, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
