<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: an unthemely response (and sexy antitrust models, too)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-antitrust-models-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-antitrust-models-too/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-antitrust-models-too/comment-page-1/#comment-186087</link>
		<dc:creator>zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-ant#comment-186087</guid>
		<description>yes... i agree with stephanie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes&#8230; i agree with stephanie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie West Allen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-antitrust-models-too/comment-page-1/#comment-39757</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie West Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/08/26/an-unthemely-response-and-sexy-ant#comment-39757</guid>
		<description>I think some bloggers will not allow posts that include a link back to the commenter&#039;s blog. I am not sure why because it is one way to add to the blogosphere conversation. I think it comes from an attitude of contraction (as opposed to expansiveness). Hey, there are enough readers out there for everyone. And, besides that, if you want to grow your readership, just watch _The Secret_. (That last thought was not serious.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some bloggers will not allow posts that include a link back to the commenter&#8217;s blog. I am not sure why because it is one way to add to the blogosphere conversation. I think it comes from an attitude of contraction (as opposed to expansiveness). Hey, there are enough readers out there for everyone. And, besides that, if you want to grow your readership, just watch _The Secret_. (That last thought was not serious.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
