<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: reviewing book review jargon (and reviving &#8220;eschew&#8221;)</title>
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/03/27/reviewing-book-review-jargon-and-reviving-eschew/</link>
	<description>"breathless punditry" and "one-breath poetry" with David Giacalone</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/03/27/reviewing-book-review-jargon-and-reviving-eschew/#comment-169683</link>
		<author>David Giacalone</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/03/27/reviewing-book-review-jargon-and-reviving-eschew/#comment-169683</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the citation, Roberta.  Having twenty-two rules seems a bit like surplusage to me, but the general rule to eschew verbal excess is a fine one in literature, not to mention authoring haiku (and weblogs, too -- a goal I need to keep in mind more often).  And, I'm pleased to have Twain on my side of the Great Eschew Debate.  I heard a newscast from the night Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated the other evening, and was pleased when "eschew" came out of the mouth of Chet Huntley. 

One of &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; reviewers called "&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Unworn-Necklace-Roberta-Beary/dp/1903543223/ref=sr_1_1/104-9212552-8069535?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1191963889&#38;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Unworn Necklace&lt;/a&gt;" compelling, but I'm not naming names.  I certainly felt compelled to &lt;a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/10/09/the-unworn-necklace-roberta-bearys-gems/" rel="nofollow"&gt;praise it mysel&lt;/a&gt;f.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the citation, Roberta.  Having twenty-two rules seems a bit like surplusage to me, but the general rule to eschew verbal excess is a fine one in literature, not to mention authoring haiku (and weblogs, too &#8212; a goal I need to keep in mind more often).  And, I&#8217;m pleased to have Twain on my side of the Great Eschew Debate.  I heard a newscast from the night Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated the other evening, and was pleased when &#8220;eschew&#8221; came out of the mouth of Chet Huntley. </p>
<p>One of <em>your</em> reviewers called &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Unworn-Necklace-Roberta-Beary/dp/1903543223/ref=sr_1_1/104-9212552-8069535?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1191963889&amp;sr=1-1" rel="nofollow">The Unworn Necklace</a>&#8221; compelling, but I&#8217;m not naming names.  I certainly felt compelled to <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2007/10/09/the-unworn-necklace-roberta-bearys-gems/" rel="nofollow">praise it mysel</a>f.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta Beary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/03/27/reviewing-book-review-jargon-and-reviving-eschew/#comment-169681</link>
		<author>Roberta Beary</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/03/27/reviewing-book-review-jargon-and-reviving-eschew/#comment-169681</guid>
		<description>see Mark Twain on James Fenimore Cooper. Twain writes: There are nineteen rules governing literary art in domain of romantic fiction -- some say twenty-two. In "Deerslayer," Cooper violated eighteen of them... Rule 14  Eschew surplusage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see Mark Twain on James Fenimore Cooper. Twain writes: There are nineteen rules governing literary art in domain of romantic fiction &#8212; some say twenty-two. In &#8220;Deerslayer,&#8221; Cooper violated eighteen of them&#8230; Rule 14  Eschew surplusage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
