<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: commission &amp; communion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kenney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181971</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181971</guid>
		<description>Hi David. My conclusion would be that both formulations are illegitimate. What I think is good public policy re: abortion is not the same as my opinion of abortion itself. And, although I favor reasonable speed limits, I&#039;d never accuse your imaginary libertarian of being in favor of speeding, any more than I&#039;d accuse someone who believes in habeas corpus of being in favor of terrorism. Stay well, my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David. My conclusion would be that both formulations are illegitimate. What I think is good public policy re: abortion is not the same as my opinion of abortion itself. And, although I favor reasonable speed limits, I&#8217;d never accuse your imaginary libertarian of being in favor of speeding, any more than I&#8217;d accuse someone who believes in habeas corpus of being in favor of terrorism. Stay well, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181869</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181869</guid>
		<description>Hello, Bill.  Thanks for leaving a poem.  

As for your question, I believe the phrase &quot;in favor of abortion&quot; is acceptable shorthand to use in an election or political context.  Compare it to saying that someone who believed, as a libertarian, there should be no speed limits on the highways was &quot;in favor of speeding&quot; -- even if he or she personally always drove at safe (and fuel-efficient) speeds and encouraged others to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Bill.  Thanks for leaving a poem.  </p>
<p>As for your question, I believe the phrase &#8220;in favor of abortion&#8221; is acceptable shorthand to use in an election or political context.  Compare it to saying that someone who believed, as a libertarian, there should be no speed limits on the highways was &#8220;in favor of speeding&#8221; &#8212; even if he or she personally always drove at safe (and fuel-efficient) speeds and encouraged others to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kenney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181852</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181852</guid>
		<description>sonogram
they begin to call it
her

&quot;position in favor of . . . abortion.&quot; Has any candidate, past or present, ever said &quot;I am in favor of abortion&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonogram<br />
they begin to call it<br />
her</p>
<p>&#8220;position in favor of . . . abortion.&#8221; Has any candidate, past or present, ever said &#8220;I am in favor of abortion&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181498</guid>
		<description>(In my smug papal/Church Lady voice): Aren&#039;t they all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(In my smug papal/Church Lady voice): Aren&#8217;t they all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181493</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181493</guid>
		<description>Anne, I think you mean &quot;self-excommunicated.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne, I think you mean &#8220;self-excommunicated.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181492</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181492</guid>
		<description>Excommunicated!

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excommunicated!</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/comment-page-1/#comment-181467</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/06/08/commission-communion/#comment-181467</guid>
		<description>I am going to subscribe to your feed in a reader

[&lt;em&gt;Ed. Note&lt;/em&gt;: Thanks for adding our rss feed (if you actually did).  However, I just looked at your &quot;NetDebt&quot; web site and have many questions about your services -- especially the fees.  Until I get a chance to review it more fully, I do not want a link from this weblog to yours, and have removed your URL.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to subscribe to your feed in a reader</p>
<p>[<em>Ed. Note</em>: Thanks for adding our rss feed (if you actually did).  However, I just looked at your "NetDebt" web site and have many questions about your services -- especially the fees.  Until I get a chance to review it more fully, I do not want a link from this weblog to yours, and have removed your URL.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
