<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a new issue of Frogpond arrives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-184029</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/#comment-184029</guid>
		<description>Hi, Don.  Thanks for the comments and for visiting us again.   I agree that &quot;if they are rendered in one-line, there should be something in structure or content compelling form.&quot;   I continue to see more and more one-liners and there seems to have less and less reason for their divergence from the 3-line format.

As someone who hopes to help the general public learn to appreciate &quot;real&quot; haiku,  one-liners seems to be a detriment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Don.  Thanks for the comments and for visiting us again.   I agree that &#8220;if they are rendered in one-line, there should be something in structure or content compelling form.&#8221;   I continue to see more and more one-liners and there seems to have less and less reason for their divergence from the 3-line format.</p>
<p>As someone who hopes to help the general public learn to appreciate &#8220;real&#8221; haiku,  one-liners seems to be a detriment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Schwerin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/comment-page-1/#comment-184028</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schwerin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/07/01/a-new-issue-of-frogpond-arrives/#comment-184028</guid>
		<description>David,

Thanks for this. My frogpond reached the upper mid-west yesterday. Recalling your dialogue with w.f. owen about haiku rendered in one line, I was looking for an increase in one-liners here and elsewhere. Some appear. Some of course, work better than others. On the whole, are you seeing an increase in number or quality of one-line poems?  If they are rendered in one-line, there should be something in structure or content compelling form. I guess I will continue to experiment and watch. Thanks for the forum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Thanks for this. My frogpond reached the upper mid-west yesterday. Recalling your dialogue with w.f. owen about haiku rendered in one line, I was looking for an increase in one-liners here and elsewhere. Some appear. Some of course, work better than others. On the whole, are you seeing an increase in number or quality of one-line poems?  If they are rendered in one-line, there should be something in structure or content compelling form. I guess I will continue to experiment and watch. Thanks for the forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
