<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: they&#8217;re all atwitter (we&#8217;re not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/</link>
	<description>breathless punditry and one-breath poetry with David Giacalone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:58:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-216774</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-216774</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting, Paul.  Social tool, maybe.  That does not mean that it is worth the time and distraction during a working lawyer&#039;s workday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting, Paul.  Social tool, maybe.  That does not mean that it is worth the time and distraction during a working lawyer&#8217;s workday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-216773</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-216773</guid>
		<description>Twitter is an amazing tool, for allowing you to connect with others</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is an amazing tool, for allowing you to connect with others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-208333</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-208333</guid>
		<description>Hello, Chris.  Thank you for sharing your experience.  If you do keep trying Twitter, let us know your reactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Chris.  Thank you for sharing your experience.  If you do keep trying Twitter, let us know your reactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Crawford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-208309</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-208309</guid>
		<description>I blogged about this Twitter phenom, and even signed up to see if I judged them too harshly:

&lt;a&gt;http://blog.justiceserved.com/?p=112&lt;/a&gt;

The verdict? Still &lt;i&gt;much ado about nothing.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged about this Twitter phenom, and even signed up to see if I judged them too harshly:</p>
<p><a>http://blog.justiceserved.com/?p=112</a></p>
<p>The verdict? Still <i>much ado about nothing.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206641</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206641</guid>
		<description>Kevin, I don&#039;t mind someone jumping with &quot;two feet&quot; on something I write. I do mind someone with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://kevin.lexblog.com/promo/about-kevin/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;large pulpit&lt;/a&gt; doing so despite what was actually written, and in such a nasty tone.  Your very similar weblog post, which has been linked to by many popular sites, has not yet been edited to reflect your changed attitude and realization.  When that happens, I&#039;ll fully accept this apology.  Until then, I appreciate this gesture.

&lt;em&gt;update&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; (Nov. 18, 2008): In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.simplejustice.us/2008/11/16/the-great-twitter-wars-begin.aspx#comment-1542483&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt; left this afternoon at &lt;em&gt;Simple Justice&lt;/em&gt;, Kevin O&#039;Keefe has refused to edit his original post, telling me to &quot;grow up,&quot; and stop worrying about &quot;ruffled feathers.&quot;  That significantly diminishes the value of his so-called apology. As the &quot;rufflee&quot; in the perpetual-cache Google world described in Daniel Solove&#039;s book, &lt;em&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Future-of-Reputation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Future of Reputation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, I do not think it&#039;s too much to ask Kevin to correct the distorted impression he created of me at his website, which he strives so hard to keep &quot;search engine optimized.&quot;

&lt;em&gt;update&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; (Jan. 4, 2009):  As I mention in an &quot;afterwords&quot; above, the unveiling of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lextweet.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lextweet&lt;/a&gt; by his &lt;em&gt;LexBlog&lt;/em&gt; company explains why Kevin got so apoplectic when I refused to be tempted into the Twitter Cage. See &lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Legal Blog Watch&lt;/em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/01/legal-tweets-find-a-place-to-perch.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I don&#8217;t mind someone jumping with &#8220;two feet&#8221; on something I write. I do mind someone with a <a href="http://kevin.lexblog.com/promo/about-kevin/" rel="nofollow">large pulpit</a> doing so despite what was actually written, and in such a nasty tone.  Your very similar weblog post, which has been linked to by many popular sites, has not yet been edited to reflect your changed attitude and realization.  When that happens, I&#8217;ll fully accept this apology.  Until then, I appreciate this gesture.</p>
<p><em>update</em><strong> (Nov. 18, 2008): In a <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2008/11/16/the-great-twitter-wars-begin.aspx#comment-1542483" rel="nofollow">comment</a> left this afternoon at <em>Simple Justice</em>, Kevin O&#8217;Keefe has refused to edit his original post, telling me to &#8220;grow up,&#8221; and stop worrying about &#8220;ruffled feathers.&#8221;  That significantly diminishes the value of his so-called apology. As the &#8220;rufflee&#8221; in the perpetual-cache Google world described in Daniel Solove&#8217;s book, <em>The <a href="http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dsolove/Future-of-Reputation/" rel="nofollow">Future of Reputation</a></em>, I do not think it&#8217;s too much to ask Kevin to correct the distorted impression he created of me at his website, which he strives so hard to keep &#8220;search engine optimized.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>update</em></strong><strong> (Jan. 4, 2009):  As I mention in an &#8220;afterwords&#8221; above, the unveiling of <a href="http://www.lextweet.com/" rel="nofollow">Lextweet</a> by his <em>LexBlog</em> company explains why Kevin got so apoplectic when I refused to be tempted into the Twitter Cage. See <em></em><em>Legal Blog Watch</em><a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/01/legal-tweets-find-a-place-to-perch.html" rel="nofollow">.</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206629</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206629</guid>
		<description>Sorry that I jumped on you with 2 feet here. Took post as advising lawyers to pass on Twitter, as opposed to what you described it as, the view of &#039;curmudgeon.&#039;

In any case, the resulting discussion has been very healthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that I jumped on you with 2 feet here. Took post as advising lawyers to pass on Twitter, as opposed to what you described it as, the view of &#8216;curmudgeon.&#8217;</p>
<p>In any case, the resulting discussion has been very healthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206501</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206501</guid>
		<description>Thank you again, Susan, for trying to bring a little moderation to this topic.  Of course, I&#039;m not too sure I wanted to know the first thing this morning that my purported naivety and ignorance are being given more attention.  Knowing you&#039;re on the case does give me considerable peace of mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you again, Susan, for trying to bring a little moderation to this topic.  Of course, I&#8217;m not too sure I wanted to know the first thing this morning that my purported naivety and ignorance are being given more attention.  Knowing you&#8217;re on the case does give me considerable peace of mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Cartier Liebel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206487</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Cartier Liebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206487</guid>
		<description>Well, David...had you been on Twitter this morning (LOL)you would have seen your post by a second degree of separation made the WSJ online. Of course, I had to put in my two cents!

http://tinyurl.com/6983wh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, David&#8230;had you been on Twitter this morning (LOL)you would have seen your post by a second degree of separation made the WSJ online. Of course, I had to put in my two cents!</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6983wh" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6983wh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review # 186 &#124; Res Ipsa Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206443</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review # 186 &#124; Res Ipsa Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206443</guid>
		<description>[...] For a run down and the new technology and reasons why some attorneys are not embracing it, check out David Giacalone&#8217;s post about Twitter at f/k/a. In response to Mr. Giacalone&#8217;s post, Kevin O&#8217;Keefe at Real Lawyers Have Blogs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a run down and the new technology and reasons why some attorneys are not embracing it, check out David Giacalone&#8217;s post about Twitter at f/k/a. In response to Mr. Giacalone&#8217;s post, Kevin O&#8217;Keefe at Real Lawyers Have Blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206231</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206231</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t find Twitter nearly as productivity-threatening as Facebook.  But that&#039;s because I&#039;m a &lt;b&gt;complete multimedia threat&lt;/b&gt;... to myself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find Twitter nearly as productivity-threatening as Facebook.  But that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a <b>complete multimedia threat</b>&#8230; to myself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206110</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206110</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Anne.  I&#039;ll take you up on your offer. Let me know if I really need a heads-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Anne.  I&#8217;ll take you up on your offer. Let me know if I really need a heads-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Reed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206109</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206109</guid>
		<description>I like Twitter a lot right now, but I bet the most common post I see there is some variation on &quot;I have to stop Twittering and get back to work!&quot;  We&#039;ll let you know if you miss anything really important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Twitter a lot right now, but I bet the most common post I see there is some variation on &#8220;I have to stop Twittering and get back to work!&#8221;  We&#8217;ll let you know if you miss anything really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206062</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206062</guid>
		<description>Hi, Ron, I&#039;ve been forced to multi-task this morning and did not have the chance to respond quickly to your Comment.  You make some good points about the differences between various types of lawyers and their relationship to Twitter. And, that&#039;s exactly why I am pretty sure that many types of lawyers have no particular need for a career-oriented use of Twitter.  (I&#039;ve made similar observations over the years about the demographics of lawyers who have time for consistently substantive weblogging -- academics, criminal defense lawyers, p/i lawyers, and the retired, with a few solos thrown in.)

And, thanks for the pointed pointer at your weblog last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ron, I&#8217;ve been forced to multi-task this morning and did not have the chance to respond quickly to your Comment.  You make some good points about the differences between various types of lawyers and their relationship to Twitter. And, that&#8217;s exactly why I am pretty sure that many types of lawyers have no particular need for a career-oriented use of Twitter.  (I&#8217;ve made similar observations over the years about the demographics of lawyers who have time for consistently substantive weblogging &#8212; academics, criminal defense lawyers, p/i lawyers, and the retired, with a few solos thrown in.)</p>
<p>And, thanks for the pointed pointer at your weblog last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Giacalone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206046</link>
		<dc:creator>David Giacalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206046</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your perspective, Joel.  Efficiently finding the blogs or tweets worth your time is indeed the problem.  Each time we are distracted by incoming messages, tweets, etc., we lose important focus on our actual job tasks.  The occasional gems to be discovered don&#039;t seem likely to make up for all those little lumps of coal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your perspective, Joel.  Efficiently finding the blogs or tweets worth your time is indeed the problem.  Each time we are distracted by incoming messages, tweets, etc., we lose important focus on our actual job tasks.  The occasional gems to be discovered don&#8217;t seem likely to make up for all those little lumps of coal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206045</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206045</guid>
		<description>I think when we talk about &quot;what is useful to lawyers?&quot; we make the mistake of thinking that by &quot;lawyers&quot; we all mean the same thing.  

Many of the biggest Twitterers are solos or in very small practices.  They not only have a reasonable expectation of developing client referrals from whatever online activity they can generate, but also lack the built-in network that people in larger firms have.  

There are other ways of going about this, but you can hardly blame them for believing that, once mastered, those of them with something to say (ahh!) will enhance their practices by virtue of being on people&#039;s radar and by having access to fast and &quot;plugged in&quot; expertise.  And, David, to be perfectly frank, they aren&#039;t necessarily overwhelmed with billable work just this minute -- I say that with all due respect and including myself in this category -- unlike lawyers in more established or institutional settings or who have firm alumni (academic or law firm) networks at their disposal.

As for me, I am a Twitter skeptic, but I am finding ways to use Twitter to maximize the bang for the buck I already get from my law blogging (which I believe is considerable) and my use of the much broader multimedia platform of Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think when we talk about &#8220;what is useful to lawyers?&#8221; we make the mistake of thinking that by &#8220;lawyers&#8221; we all mean the same thing.  </p>
<p>Many of the biggest Twitterers are solos or in very small practices.  They not only have a reasonable expectation of developing client referrals from whatever online activity they can generate, but also lack the built-in network that people in larger firms have.  </p>
<p>There are other ways of going about this, but you can hardly blame them for believing that, once mastered, those of them with something to say (ahh!) will enhance their practices by virtue of being on people&#8217;s radar and by having access to fast and &#8220;plugged in&#8221; expertise.  And, David, to be perfectly frank, they aren&#8217;t necessarily overwhelmed with billable work just this minute &#8212; I say that with all due respect and including myself in this category &#8212; unlike lawyers in more established or institutional settings or who have firm alumni (academic or law firm) networks at their disposal.</p>
<p>As for me, I am a Twitter skeptic, but I am finding ways to use Twitter to maximize the bang for the buck I already get from my law blogging (which I believe is considerable) and my use of the much broader multimedia platform of Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/2008/11/15/theyre-all-atwitter-were-not/comment-page-1/#comment-206042</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ethicalesq/?p=10286#comment-206042</guid>
		<description>With respect, that&#039;s exactly the (well, actually, a) wrong question. If twitter suffers from Sturgeon&#039;s Law, that&#039;s to be expected.  A good question is &quot;are there any lawyer blogs/twitter accounts worth reading by other lawyers and/or the general public, and, if there are, how does one find them?&quot;  

I&#039;m not claiming to know the answer -- except about some lawyer blogs, and the share of the general public that consists of me -- but I think that is the key question.  

I&#039;m not, by the way, a twitter fan; the only tweets I followed were of the anarchists during the RNC; they were using Twitter to organize and communicate. But maybe I&#039;m missing some twits that I&#039;d find of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect, that&#8217;s exactly the (well, actually, a) wrong question. If twitter suffers from Sturgeon&#8217;s Law, that&#8217;s to be expected.  A good question is &#8220;are there any lawyer blogs/twitter accounts worth reading by other lawyers and/or the general public, and, if there are, how does one find them?&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not claiming to know the answer &#8212; except about some lawyer blogs, and the share of the general public that consists of me &#8212; but I think that is the key question.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not, by the way, a twitter fan; the only tweets I followed were of the anarchists during the RNC; they were using Twitter to organize and communicate. But maybe I&#8217;m missing some twits that I&#8217;d find of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
