the radiator wakes me,
lulls me to sleep
… by dagosan
.. How would you have answered Jacob A. Stein’s headline question in his newest Legal Spectator column, “Did You Read the Latest Opinion of the Supreme Court?” (Washington Lawyer, February 2009). The sage columnist lists 37 possible answers, but you should feel free to add 38. Other ______________ .
To give you a taste, here’s a dozen replies offered by Stein. (The f/k/a Gang are leaning toward #17.)
1. I read about it in Linda Greenhouse’s story in The New York Times.
7. Let’s just say I flipped through it.
8. I liked that strong language in the dissent.
11. Is it filled with original intent?
17. I usually take it to bed with me. It must be under the covers.
18. Congress will take care of it, just you wait and see.
19. Was it another punitive damages case, or was it the gun case?
30. Why don’t they televise the arguments?
36. How much of these opinions do the clerks write?
37. I am going into the hospital for some minor surgery, and I will read it there.
……. What about Dan Hull? Forget the disparaging remarks of Ron Baker, Kevin O’Keefe and Enrico Schaefer, what am I ever going to do about JD Hull. Over at his What About Clients? weblog, Dan insists on saying really nice things about me — or, at least about someone named David Giacalone at f/k/a who bears little or no resemblance to your cranky Editor. For recent examples, see here (“the blawgosphere’s spiritual leader David Giacalone . . . is the only sensitive guy we ever liked even a little bit”) and there (“spiritual leader and technical adviser in one person . . . Keep reading him”). When I leave comments asking for retractions, Dan forgets to post them. So, let’s get a few of things straight:
- if you come here for either spiritual or technical advcse, you need a Plan B
- we’re trying to keep a low profile these days, and our pundit necks are more likely to be in our shells than stuck out very far trying to make waves, pass judgments, or garner links
- we’ve been unsuccessfully striving for haiku- and zen-like humility at f/k/a for almost six years; Hull’s hallelujahs are not helping
- we know Dan is not merely fishing for mutual compliments, ’cause he’s got one of the most-praised weblogs in the entire blawgiverse (see the left-SideBar on his WAC home page); so, we’re starting to get paranoid about hidden agendas and anxious about living up to Dan’s high expectations. Humbled and honored. But, mostly humbled.
Despite the above lapse in judgment, Dan seems to be on the mark with his list of “The Big Six must-reading lawyer sites” for quickly and efficiently getting “all the news–and new ideas” from lawyer weblogs. He also does a very good job there limning the legal profession’s young Slackoiesie.
dust from a slap
on the horse’s rump
… by w.f. owen – white lies: RMA 2008
orig pub. Mainichi Daily News #706
Fibs and White Lies: Dan Hull’s praise quite naturally reminds us to continue to bring you selections from “white lies: Red Moon Anthology 2008” (by Jim Kacian and the Red Moon Press Editorial Staff, January 2009; see our prior post). “white lies” contains some of the very best haiku-related poetry published in 2008, and our Honored Guest poets are, as always, well-represented.
could talk to anyone
a cushion of pine needles
I recall my past
…. by George Swede – white lies: RMA 2008
orig. pub. Acorn 21
I summarize my life
for a stranger
…. by Hilary Tann – white lies: RMA 2008
orig. pub. Upstate Dim Sum 2008/II