Archive for February, 2005

Women and Creativity

0

Two examples submitted for your approval and consideration - here in the Berkblog Zone.

Faith married a long time friend. Mr. Faith married really, really
well, In fact, at one point, the ‘not quite decided to be Mr.
Faith’  was told by another long time friend of mine, “If you
don’t marry her I will”. I don’t know exactly when this happened, but
it might have been while we were all anarchist swimming in Spy Pond.

They were a two career couple struggling with just how New Age they
were going to be. Her job was not the career she had imagined for
herself in her youth [ She had had the creative urge from early on],
but it seemed to meet her basic need.  Eventually they decided to
try to make baby. I think it was more her idea than his, but I don’t
actually know. When she became pregnant her job became just fine thank
you very much. When she lost the baby, her job and everything else in
the universe became without form and void.

There was light again, then dark. Light. Dark. I don’t know the exact
number. Maybe I shouldn’t. But eventually the lamp stayed lit. My
brother, 1944, was  “Gee honey I don’t know if I’ll make it back.”
I, 1947, am an accident of enthusiasm at being back. But the daughter
of Faith was anything but an accident.

———

Lisa is a stay at home mom and quite proud of it, thank you very much.
She was an analyst and may be again. But for now, raising the kids is
enough — almost. She blogs her life and  is a significant
contributor to the advancement of blogcraft.

———

So tell me now, is there a relationship between the gift
of creativity a woman has in her womb and the gift of creativity she
has in her mind? Should we [or could we] try to create a partition if
nature thinks otherwise?

The old bachelor by the door who looks after things.
randy.f

What is a University supposed to be about?

0

… especially one that fancies itself the greatest steward of the humanities in the world?

You
can click the picture for a 2x enlargement. Even so, You can’t see it,
but in the upper right hand corner, Paul Gauguin wrote three questions:

Where do we come from?
What are we?
 Where are we going?

{I
will put up the original french [I’ll clip from the Web :) ] after I
enable French Characters on my [I’m ashamed to say] WinXP.}

As
we sit on the brink of World War III, this last seems most pressing.
Much like the NBER assessment of the economy, we won’t know until we’re
a bit farther down the road. WWW III is actually a small worry compared
to the extinction of our species which we seem to be signing up for.
We’re in deep s**t and could use all the help we can get. Honest
science can help. I say let’s invite the women. [Gee that was a bit
awkward!] Let’s ask the women to help us. [Would a truly efficient
market ignore more than half of the talent pool?] It’s not enough to
wait till University, but it’s a start. Let’s get cracking shall we? We
don’t really know how much time we have.

Professor Stephen, who
recently left us, would be very sad. He quotes Charles Darwin, “If the
misery of our poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our
institutions, great is our sin.” Not only are we mismeasuring man,
woman, and child, but we are mismeasuring [or in some cases not
measuring when we should and could] homo economicus as well. Let’s look
at this more carefully shall we? Before we reduce any more economies
and our own to feudalism. A ray of hope is Professor Stephen, who is
still with us. Others though, including some of the most influential in
the University, have, I fear, caused Harvard’s sin to be huge.

I don’t really know why Professor Cornell is no longer here. I did not know him personally. Still I miss him. Google points
me to context of the quote from Professor Charles. He believes that
slavery is a greater sin than what might be caused by the market. Like
Professor Michael, he believes there are moral limits to markets. I
will ask, [real soon now] has ‘market’ ever been defined without
explicit or implicit moral limits? And have the definers been honest
about their purpose?

I apologize to Professor Diana. Her
sweet, beautiful misapprehension was not of the business model of this
University, but a hopefully small portion of our fellows. I will tell
you. And I would like to tell about the day that Professor Margaret
took on all the faculty on Observatory Hill to say what honest
empiricism required her to say.

But what do I know?
I’m just the guy by the door who looks after things.

randy.f

Nighline asked, “Why do you come to the meetings?”

0

After all we have all this super woopie do e-comm gear. Several answers Here’s the first in three parts.

1. At MIT they say that getting an education there is like getting a
drink from a firehose. [MIT was significant in the invention of the net
- the IMP or primordial router was invented there. ] Getting a drink
from the Web [or it’s blogosphere subset] is even harder. Talking
to another person or small group can help. Ordinary Websites are fairly
static. They respond to their visitors in limited controlled
ways.  They are mostly one to many.

2. But Nightline sez, you can talk to people on the net. Yes you can
but each tool has different properties. Blogs are basically one to
many, but they do allow more interaction from visitors.  Forums
are more democratic. E-mail is truly bilateral. They allow more
symmetric communicaton. People have more freedom to attune their
messages to their recipients. BUT all  these tools have a
significant time delay. They are interactive, but not immediate [some
are unsychronized -email, blogs and forums -  IRC is just a bit tedious.]
They are all relatively uninflected e.g. no tone of voice.

3. Face to face exchanges between people are geographically limited.
You have to be there. Face to face is both  interactive [modulo
civility] and immediate. It includes tone of voice and body language.
[Could bilateral video do this? Maybe some day.] The essential skill of
the new age is not to master a specific tool or tools, but to
understand their different limitations and the relationship between
them*. More important is to understand the talents and limitations of
your audience and yourself. And finally the relationship between the
people and the tools. Berkman Center for what?

*The boundaries between different tools are at the moment too sharp. We
need software that allows communicants to move more freely between
different modes. More in a future post.

Iraq War Veterans Tour

0

Veterans returning from the Iraq War are touring eastern Massachusetts. It is sponsored by Iraq Veterans against the War and Military Families Speak Out. The kickoff was Sunday Jan 30 at Faneuil Hall.There was a vigil outside and testimony in the Great Hall.
More pictures. Click on the thumbs to get full pages.

Last night Kelly Doughtery of IVAW and Nancy Lessin of MFSO spoke at Harriet Tubman House in Roxbury. I’ll put up some pictures for you. Fen’s first law of blogging: a blog account and a digital camera doesn’t automatically make you a journalist.

The tour is coming to Harvard on Friday - Science Center D 4:00 PM.

-r

Was the Iraq Election a Sucess?

0

Only twenty some bombings reported. A quiet day? Are the media telling us the whole story? Were the reporters able to get to the story? Afterall the whole country was locked down. What has happened to us that we think that only twenty bombings is a good day?

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. Going into it, I wondered how the US Military would be able to able to achieve what has eluded them for two years. Randi Rhodes theorized that this shows they could have done it all along. There are possible theories that might not be entirely tinfoil hat. Perhaps the desire to have the Iraqi military on point has compromised operations. But, I think Juan Cole has the right answer. The U.S. Military proved that they can produce a relative calm for a one day national holiday when all transportation is shut down. [Unless the lock down prevented reporting of a lot of incidents.] The question is, what happens when the demands of commerce require allowing greater freedom of movement? We are there to rebuild the economy right? Juan thinks the newly elected officials will all have to move to the Green Zone or they will be killed. I wonder how many inked fingers will be chopped off.

At the moment, the insurgents are only the Sunni. Presumably the Kurds think they have a reasonable deal with the new government. And al Sistani seems to think he negotiated a good deal for the Shia. Will this hold up? Is the U.S. presence any more than stage directing a civil war?

I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

Ok. The election was a success. So bring the troops home already!

Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress