Comments on: To Save the Planet, Build More…Skyscrapers? http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/2009/02/18/to-save-the-planet-build-moreskyscrapers/ HLS Forum on Local Government Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:52:40 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Achilles Tendonitis http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/2009/02/18/to-save-the-planet-build-moreskyscrapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1909 Achilles Tendonitis Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:52:40 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/?p=23#comment-1909 nice image. nice image.

]]> By: Arbitrage Conspiracy Reviews http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/2009/02/18/to-save-the-planet-build-moreskyscrapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1890 Arbitrage Conspiracy Reviews Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:29:45 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/?p=23#comment-1890 I really never thought about this that the skyscrapers could also be one way to save the earth. But after reading your article I am really impressed. What a thought...really great. I really never thought about this that the skyscrapers could also be one way to save the earth. But after reading your article I am really impressed. What a thought…really great.

]]> By: Repo Cars Woman http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/2009/02/18/to-save-the-planet-build-moreskyscrapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1829 Repo Cars Woman Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:01:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/?p=23#comment-1829 Skyscrapers are surely the way to go. We must prevent flooding disasters from run-off etc and to do that we need to build upwards and not sideways. By the way, is that a pic from an Ayn Rand novel? Skyscrapers are surely the way to go. We must prevent flooding disasters from run-off etc and to do that we need to build upwards and not sideways.

By the way, is that a pic from an Ayn Rand novel?

]]> By: kerala http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/2009/02/18/to-save-the-planet-build-moreskyscrapers/comment-page-1/#comment-1643 kerala Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:42:32 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/forum/?p=23#comment-1643 this was a great information that "New Yorker emits 4,462 pounds less of transportation-related carbon dioxide than his suburbanite counterpart". i still can't believe it. From this we support the sky scrapers. thanks for the light this was a great information that “New Yorker emits 4,462 pounds less of transportation-related carbon dioxide than his suburbanite counterpart”. i still can’t believe it.

From this we support the sky scrapers. thanks for the light

]]>