<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just wondering&#8230; about movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of living people. Lives of thinking people.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 19:13:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>ano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>hello</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gui</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Gui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 01:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/grosscomplement/2006/12/04/just-wondering-about-sequels/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Way to make we need naive, Luke.

The few people with whom I&#039;ve shared this idea like it.


Also, sequels have an incentive *not* to be great.  Normal movies need to be good to get  reviewed at all.  Sequels don&#039;t.

Directors know this.  They should invest less in making sequels good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to make we need naive, Luke.</p>
<p>The few people with whom I&#8217;ve shared this idea like it.</p>
<p>Also, sequels have an incentive *not* to be great.  Normal movies need to be good to get  reviewed at all.  Sequels don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Directors know this.  They should invest less in making sequels good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
