Al Hoang

August 11, 2004

Online Principles and the online world

Filed under: tagme — @ 11:06 am

Freedom to Tinker has a post
on Online Principles. While it is interesting to see people throw up
proposals for what people should do. I’m skeptical. However, there
was an excellent comment from Hal regarding the online world. I am
quoting it below since it is so good it can stand on its own. I really
agree with the poster’s thoughts on cyberspace which I’ve spent a long
time hanging around on.

There really is no “group” of online people. There are no “netizens”. The set of people online is not different in any material way from the entire body of the people. This is becoming more true every day.

Our principles and goals, to the extent that “we” can be said to have any such thing, are merely those principles and goals which guide every person in their life. They do not differ when one goes online.

What matters, then, is not defining special principles for being online; but rather, examining how our existing goals are best implemented given this new communications technology.

Online communications differs from older methods in degree, not in kind. People have always had free and universal communications with their nearest neighbors and close friends. The net expands this capability by many orders of magnitude, which raises new problems. Where communications before were largely confined to small and relatively uniform groups, where there was a certain amount of public visibility and awareness of the activities of others, the net spreads communications around the world, and allows the formation of groupings which are anonymous and relatively invisible to others.

These are the challenges of online communications: new forms of anti-social and harmful behavior; and communications which cross cultural and jurisdictional boundaries. Our existing policies and principles are not well adapted to the worldwide scale of today’s net. I suspect it will take many years before we learn how to incorporate these new capabilities into our lives in a way which is beneficial and harmonizes with our goals and principles. It is premature at best to begin writing the rules today.

Read the discussion
that started this all.

Odds are Prime

Filed under: tagme — @ 11:06 am

The phrase, “Odd numbers are prime” is quite amusing if we look at it from
a viewpoint of polysemy. The following link shows some other ways to look
at it from a linguist standpoint.

A Linguist’s look at odds are prime

Do you IMDB?

Filed under: tagme — @ 12:13 am

LA Weekly has a great article on IMDB and
the story of how it got started.

IMDB is a subsidiary of the empire
known as Amazon.com but is allowed to run independently. One would
like to think that IMDB sprang from
nowhere however it took 5 years before they started going commercial.
That’s 5 years doing this project on top of whatever else they were
doing.

Now if they could only get some more Asian correspondants to cover
Asian movies in more detail.

Read the LA Times article yourself

Thanks to Gen for the link

It’s a big ask

Filed under: tagme — @ 12:05 am

Language Log
talks about the usage of ask as a noun. I didn’t realize that ask
could be used as a noun myself. It feels weird to hear it but supposedly
Kerry used it in a speech during a campaign in Missouri.

Here’s the excerpt:


I’m asking you to trust our nation, our history, the world, your families, in my hands. And I understand that it’s a big ask. And it’s a tough judgment you have to make.

Go read the Language Log Post yourself for why this might be just a
case of variation and not incorrect usage

Powered by WordPress

Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress