<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increasing the Role of Technology in the Prevention of Genocide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/06/11/increasing-role-of-technology-in-the-prevention-of-genocide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/06/11/increasing-role-of-technology-in-the-prevention-of-genocide/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the Internet and Democracy Project team at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:33:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: balderdash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/06/11/increasing-role-of-technology-in-the-prevention-of-genocide/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>balderdash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/06/11/increasing-role-of-technology-in-the-p#comment-681</guid>
		<description>&quot;allow opposing ideologies to engage in debate peacefully&quot;

sadly, what is prevalent with opposing ideologies is they tend to NOT debate peacefully. i fear whether the anonymity of secure forums actually aggravates more the burning atmosphere of two fighting parties as they can post potentially harmful remarks on their own whim thinking they would not suffer the consequences. true, a moderator role should be introduced but technically, wouldn&#039;t that be equivalent to monitoring or filtering of some form as well?
however , it has to be agreed that secure forums and blogs are the century&#039;s most revolutionary medium in influencing the commoners ideology; either for highlighting injustice, alerting the masses of atrocities and spreading propaganda( and libel too) at a much faster pace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;allow opposing ideologies to engage in debate peacefully&#8221;</p>
<p>sadly, what is prevalent with opposing ideologies is they tend to NOT debate peacefully. i fear whether the anonymity of secure forums actually aggravates more the burning atmosphere of two fighting parties as they can post potentially harmful remarks on their own whim thinking they would not suffer the consequences. true, a moderator role should be introduced but technically, wouldn&#8217;t that be equivalent to monitoring or filtering of some form as well?<br />
however , it has to be agreed that secure forums and blogs are the century&#8217;s most revolutionary medium in influencing the commoners ideology; either for highlighting injustice, alerting the masses of atrocities and spreading propaganda( and libel too) at a much faster pace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
