<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook More Popular than Porn on Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the Internet and Democracy Project team at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:33:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>Yeah, those fiqures are just based on search engine queries. As a whole porn would still be more popular by a very wide margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, those fiqures are just based on search engine queries. As a whole porn would still be more popular by a very wide margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m curious, though, if this finding is reflected in visits/page views or simply in Google searches.&quot;

Tancer wrote about this last year on a Time blog. The below quote regards hits, not searches.

&quot;for web users over the age of 25, Adult Entertainment still ranks high in popularity, coming in second, after search engines. Not so for 18- to 24-year-olds, for whom social networks rank first, followed by search engines, then web-based e-mail — with porn sites lagging behind in fourth.&quot;

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m curious, though, if this finding is reflected in visits/page views or simply in Google searches.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tancer wrote about this last year on a Time blog. The below quote regards hits, not searches.</p>
<p>&#8220;for web users over the age of 25, Adult Entertainment still ranks high in popularity, coming in second, after search engines. Not so for 18- to 24-year-olds, for whom social networks rank first, followed by search engines, then web-based e-mail — with porn sites lagging behind in fourth.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Etling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Etling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>Agree completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kosara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1088</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kosara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1088</guid>
		<description>While facebook may be higher than any single term, we&#039;d have to know how these terms overlap (i.e., appear in the same query) to figure out if their sum is higher than fb.

But I mainly commented because I felt that this is shaky data to jump to such conclusions from. Search terms are one thing (and they&#039;re difficult to analyze well), but there must be more meaningful metrics like money spent, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While facebook may be higher than any single term, we&#8217;d have to know how these terms overlap (i.e., appear in the same query) to figure out if their sum is higher than fb.</p>
<p>But I mainly commented because I felt that this is shaky data to jump to such conclusions from. Search terms are one thing (and they&#8217;re difficult to analyze well), but there must be more meaningful metrics like money spent, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Etling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Etling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>And in the US, Myspace and Facebook are still far ahead of searches for the terms sex and porn.  So the hypothesis that social networking sites beat out porn seems to hold.

http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cmyspace%2Cporn%2Csex&amp;geo=US&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in the US, Myspace and Facebook are still far ahead of searches for the terms sex and porn.  So the hypothesis that social networking sites beat out porn seems to hold.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cmyspace%2Cporn%2Csex&amp;geo=US&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cmyspace%2Cporn%2Csex&amp;geo=US&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Etling</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Etling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  I assume Tancer has better data on this in his book, and I just wanted to see if a quick search on google insights would have similar findings.  However, if you do an expanded search on google insights with some additional terms as you suggest, for example with the words facebook, porn, sex, and xxx, you still get higher results in September 2008 for facebook than any other single term. 
    http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cporn%2Csex%2Cxxx&amp;geo=&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  I assume Tancer has better data on this in his book, and I just wanted to see if a quick search on google insights would have similar findings.  However, if you do an expanded search on google insights with some additional terms as you suggest, for example with the words facebook, porn, sex, and xxx, you still get higher results in September 2008 for facebook than any other single term.<br />
    <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cporn%2Csex%2Cxxx&amp;geo=&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=facebook%2Cporn%2Csex%2Cxxx&amp;geo=&amp;date=today%2012-m&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kosara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/2008/09/22/facebook-more-popular-than-porn-on-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kosara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/idblog/?p=263#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>The problem with this is that it only captures searches for the word &quot;porn&quot; vs. the word &quot;facebook.&quot; There are probably other terms you would search for if you were looking for porn, though, and those are not shown here. Also, it&#039;s interesting that this is for the world overall. If you &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=Facebook%2Cporn&amp;geo=US&amp;date=&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;filter down to US only&lt;/a&gt;, porn is still ahead. So I would suggest that this trend is mostly due to the sudden rise in popularity of facebook outside the US, and that any increases in searches for porn in other languages are not captured by picking a single English word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this is that it only captures searches for the word &#8220;porn&#8221; vs. the word &#8220;facebook.&#8221; There are probably other terms you would search for if you were looking for porn, though, and those are not shown here. Also, it&#8217;s interesting that this is for the world overall. If you <a href="http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=&amp;q=Facebook%2Cporn&amp;geo=US&amp;date=&amp;clp=&amp;cmpt=q" rel="nofollow">filter down to US only</a>, porn is still ahead. So I would suggest that this trend is mostly due to the sudden rise in popularity of facebook outside the US, and that any increases in searches for porn in other languages are not captured by picking a single English word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
