<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia and politics, Part 74</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/04/26/wikipedia-and-politics-part-74/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/04/26/wikipedia-and-politics-part-74/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Wikipedia and politics, part 74 1/2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/04/26/wikipedia-and-politics-part-74/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Wikipedia and politics, part 74 1/2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/04/26/wikipedia-and-politics-part-74/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I speculated that a controversy around the use of Wikipedia in a Georgia political campaign was really just another example of people misunderstanding Wikipedia and unfairly holding it to different standards than other media.  Today, given recent developments, I am not so sure. Secretary of State Cathy Cox has fired her campaign manager, Morton Brilliant (great name, eh?), who apparently edited her opponent&#8217;s Wikipedia entry to add mention of a drunk-driving incident involving the opponent&#8217;s son.  (Well, she &#8220;accepted his resignation,&#8221; which in this case translates to &#8220;fired&#8221;).  As CNN.com reports, both Cox and her opponent&#8217;s campaign cast the firing in terms of the drunk-driving issue being inappropriate and not, as I had feared, the use of Wikipedia: Taylor spokesman Rick Dent said earlier Wednesday that the Cox campaign was &#8220;exploiting a tragedy for political reasons.&#8221; He also asked for an apology from Cox and for Brilliant to be fired. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I speculated that a controversy around the use of Wikipedia in a Georgia political campaign was really just another example of people misunderstanding Wikipedia and unfairly holding it to different standards than other media.  Today, given recent developments, I am not so sure. Secretary of State Cathy Cox has fired her campaign manager, Morton Brilliant (great name, eh?), who apparently edited her opponent&#8217;s Wikipedia entry to add mention of a drunk-driving incident involving the opponent&#8217;s son.  (Well, she &#8220;accepted his resignation,&#8221; which in this case translates to &#8220;fired&#8221;).  As&nbsp;<a href="http://CNN.com" title="http://CNN. " target="_blank">CNN.com</a> reports, both Cox and her opponent&#8217;s campaign cast the firing in terms of the drunk-driving issue being inappropriate and not, as I had feared, the use of Wikipedia: Taylor spokesman Rick Dent said earlier Wednesday that the Cox campaign was &#8220;exploiting a tragedy for political reasons.&#8221; He also asked for an apology from Cox and for Brilliant to be fired. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
