<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a Focus on al Qaeda Yield Billions of Phone Records?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billions-of-phone-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billions-of-phone-records/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:32:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William McGeveran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billions-of-phone-records/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>William McGeveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billion#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I am turning off comments to this particular post for spam management reasons.  Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am turning off comments to this particular post for spam management reasons.  Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; NSA Blog Stroll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billions-of-phone-records/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; NSA Blog Stroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billion#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] Like Dan Solove, I thought I might offer some analysis of the NSA&#8217;s acquisition of domestic telephone records (see previous post here), but then discovered that very smart people had already written great posts.  In particular, see Orin Kerr, Marty Lederman, and Kate Martin (a guest on the ACS Blog). So I shall defer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like Dan Solove, I thought I might offer some analysis of the NSA&#8217;s acquisition of domestic telephone records (see previous post here), but then discovered that very smart people had already written great posts.  In particular, see Orin Kerr, Marty Lederman, and Kate Martin (a guest on the ACS Blog). So I shall defer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Franscell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billions-of-phone-records/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Franscell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 22:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/05/11/can-a-focus-on-al-qaeda-yield-billion#comment-14</guid>
		<description>From media blogger Ron Franscell at http://underthenews.blogspot.com ...

The White House says &quot;the intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks.&quot; Don&#039;t get me wrong: I want to be protected from terrorist attacks and I think the government should do that. But I&#039;m also old enough to remember the Vietnam logic that &quot;we must destroy this village to save it,&quot; so I don&#039;t necessarily trust these guys to be great thinkers.

What happens when our &quot;leaky&quot; White House is looking at Hillary&#039;s phone records and, oops, accidentally &quot;leaks&quot; that every Wednesday night she&#039;s been calling an escort service in North Tonawonda? These guys don&#039;t seem to be above using such information for the &quot;greater good&quot; of re-electing Republicans to protect Americans from terrorists.

If the NSA studies my phone records for the past year, they&#039;ll find what I found in an exhaustive analysis: 1,845 calls to my son and daughter, in which I generally ask &quot;how&#039;s the weather?&quot;; 1,045 phone calls to Allstate Insurance Co. to complain about the service after Hurricane Rita; 516 calls to my cell phone company to ask how to operate my cell phone; 511 to old friends in Colorado, in which I generally ask &quot;how&#039;s the weather?&quot;; 435 to tech support at America Online; 20 to the pizza parlor up the street, always on an NFL game day; and six to my parents, in which I generally ask &quot;how&#039;s the weather?&quot;

No bookies, no hookers, no sex lines, no fun. Really, my main concern is that somebody will check my phone calls and find that my life is terribly boring and I&#039;m not really worth protecting from terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From media blogger Ron Franscell at <a href="http://underthenews.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://underthenews.blogspot.com</a> &#8230;</p>
<p>The White House says &#8220;the intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks.&#8221; Don&#8217;t get me wrong: I want to be protected from terrorist attacks and I think the government should do that. But I&#8217;m also old enough to remember the Vietnam logic that &#8220;we must destroy this village to save it,&#8221; so I don&#8217;t necessarily trust these guys to be great thinkers.</p>
<p>What happens when our &#8220;leaky&#8221; White House is looking at Hillary&#8217;s phone records and, oops, accidentally &#8220;leaks&#8221; that every Wednesday night she&#8217;s been calling an escort service in North Tonawonda? These guys don&#8217;t seem to be above using such information for the &#8220;greater good&#8221; of re-electing Republicans to protect Americans from terrorists.</p>
<p>If the NSA studies my phone records for the past year, they&#8217;ll find what I found in an exhaustive analysis: 1,845 calls to my son and daughter, in which I generally ask &#8220;how&#8217;s the weather?&#8221;; 1,045 phone calls to Allstate Insurance Co. to complain about the service after Hurricane Rita; 516 calls to my cell phone company to ask how to operate my cell phone; 511 to old friends in Colorado, in which I generally ask &#8220;how&#8217;s the weather?&#8221;; 435 to tech support at America Online; 20 to the pizza parlor up the street, always on an NFL game day; and six to my parents, in which I generally ask &#8220;how&#8217;s the weather?&#8221;</p>
<p>No bookies, no hookers, no sex lines, no fun. Really, my main concern is that somebody will check my phone calls and find that my life is terribly boring and I&#8217;m not really worth protecting from terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
