<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal Court Strikes Down NSA Wiretapping Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/08/17/federal-court-strikes-down-nsa-wiretapping-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/08/17/federal-court-strikes-down-nsa-wiretapping-program/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:35:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; NSA Surveillance: The Sequel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/08/17/federal-court-strikes-down-nsa-wiretapping-program/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; NSA Surveillance: The Sequel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 22:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/08/17/federal-court-strikes-down-nsa-wireta#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill and I wrote about the government&#8217;s program of warrantless surveillance of certain electronic communications a while ago. Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, who sits on the federal district court here in Detroit, issued a decision finding the program (dubbed the &#8220;Terrorist Surveillance Program&#8221; by the Bush administration - legal argument by nomenclature?) unconstitutional. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay of her order that would have shut down the surveillance, pending arguments. Now the appellate court is hearing those arguments. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill and I wrote about the government&#8217;s program of warrantless surveillance of certain electronic communications a while ago. Judge Anna Diggs Taylor, who sits on the federal district court here in Detroit, issued a decision finding the program (dubbed the &#8220;Terrorist Surveillance Program&#8221; by the Bush administration &#8211; legal argument by nomenclature?) unconstitutional. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay of her order that would have shut down the surveillance, pending arguments. Now the appellate court is hearing those arguments. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
