<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balkin on the National Surveillance State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:44:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tirannia totale &#171; Io voto Pro Lib3rty Iniziative Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-99007</link>
		<dc:creator>Tirannia totale &#171; Io voto Pro Lib3rty Iniziative Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-99007</guid>
		<description>[...] “Nuovo Stato nazionale di Sorveglianza”, così ben descritto da Jack Balkin avrà un impatto profondo anche sulle vicende economiche: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Nuovo Stato nazionale di Sorveglianza”, così ben descritto da Jack Balkin avrà un impatto profondo anche sulle vicende economiche: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmotarians, Paleotarians, &#38; Philip Bobbitt &#171; Indistinct Union</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-67787</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmotarians, Paleotarians, &#38; Philip Bobbitt &#171; Indistinct Union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-67787</guid>
		<description>[...] think??) for the cosmotarian crowd, The Market State they advocate for automatically comes with The National Surveillance State, Private Military Companies, and Virtual States of Trans-national Terror &amp; Criminality.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think??) for the cosmotarian crowd, The Market State they advocate for automatically comes with The National Surveillance State, Private Military Companies, and Virtual States of Trans-national Terror &amp; Criminality.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Penn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-38413</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Penn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-38413</guid>
		<description>&quot;Balkin suggested that effective regulation of the surveillance state was unlikely to come from legislatures or courts. One idea he alluded to was the possibility of independent ombudsman-like figures to monitor abuses, perhaps without always revealing sensitive details about their concerns to the public at large. &quot;

I like that idea on paper. Maybe it&#039;s the pessimis in me, but i believe it would not turn out so perfect, with corruption in this &quot;indepedent&quot; body of monitoring, and nor do i believe the government would accept such a system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Balkin suggested that effective regulation of the surveillance state was unlikely to come from legislatures or courts. One idea he alluded to was the possibility of independent ombudsman-like figures to monitor abuses, perhaps without always revealing sensitive details about their concerns to the public at large. &#8221;</p>
<p>I like that idea on paper. Maybe it&#8217;s the pessimis in me, but i believe it would not turn out so perfect, with corruption in this &#8220;indepedent&#8221; body of monitoring, and nor do i believe the government would accept such a system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William McGeveran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>William McGeveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-876</guid>
		<description>Luis:  There is overlap between the second half of the essay to which you linked and the talk Balkin gave here in Minnesota, but it is overlap like a Venn diagram: each one includes stuff that is not incorporated in the other.

I don&#039;t know when the Minnesota piece will come out -- not that soon, I am afraid.  It will be the legal scholarship time frame, not the blog time frame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis:  There is overlap between the second half of the essay to which you linked and the talk Balkin gave here in Minnesota, but it is overlap like a Venn diagram: each one includes stuff that is not incorporated in the other.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know when the Minnesota piece will come out &#8212; not that soon, I am afraid.  It will be the legal scholarship time frame, not the blog time frame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Also, any idea of the relationship of the UMinn LR paper and &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=930514&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this paper?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, any idea of the relationship of the UMinn LR paper and <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=930514" rel="nofollow">this paper?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-state/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/10/10/balkin-on-the-national-surveillance-s#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Fascinating. When is the article coming out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating. When is the article coming out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
