<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Electronic Voting Systems Ready for Tuesday?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-for-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-for-tuesday/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WebWriting.com &#187; Voter Fraud 2006</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>WebWriting.com &#187; Voter Fraud 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-f#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>[...] Are Electronic Voting Systems Ready for Tuesday? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are Electronic Voting Systems Ready for Tuesday? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; More on Paperless Voting Machines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; More on Paperless Voting Machines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-f#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that we are finally recognizing the problems inherent in e-voting. But because of the huge quantity of money that has already been spent on deficient systems, solutions to problems may be prospective only. As a result, many of the jurisdictions that were the quickest to adopt high-tech voting machines will be stuck with problems the longest! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that we are finally recognizing the problems inherent in e-voting. But because of the huge quantity of money that has already been spent on deficient systems, solutions to problems may be prospective only. As a result, many of the jurisdictions that were the quickest to adopt high-tech voting machines will be stuck with problems the longest! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Electionline Report on Voting Systems</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-for-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Electionline Report on Voting Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/03/are-electronic-voting-systems-ready-f#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>[...] Electionline.org has issued a preliminary report assessing the performance of voting technology and administration in the recent election, which election law expert Rick Hasen calls &#8220;required reading.&#8221;  The upshot: we didn&#8217;t have the meltdown that I&#8217;d worried about.  But the report describes how we need to prepare for new problems and not only for those that arose in prior elections.  Any IT professional could tell you that, but it is not the operating principle in election administration.  In an interview on Minnesota Public Radio this morning, Doug Chapin, Electionline&#8217;s director, went further, noting that the widespread problems they documented may have been minor only because the localities with irregularities happened were not, by and large, the same ones that had close races. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]&nbsp;<a href="http://Electionline.org" title="http://Electionline. " target="_blank">Electionline.org</a> has issued a preliminary report assessing the performance of voting technology and administration in the recent election, which election law expert Rick Hasen calls &#8220;required reading.&#8221;  The upshot: we didn&#8217;t have the meltdown that I&#8217;d worried about.  But the report describes how we need to prepare for new problems and not only for those that arose in prior elections.  Any IT professional could tell you that, but it is not the operating principle in election administration.  In an interview on Minnesota Public Radio this morning, Doug Chapin, Electionline&#8217;s director, went further, noting that the widespread problems they documented may have been minor only because the localities with irregularities happened were not, by and large, the same ones that had close races. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
