<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanksgiving for New DMCA Exceptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:25:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs &#124; Finley &#38; Cook, PLLC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-86844</link>
		<dc:creator>Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs &#124; Finley &#38; Cook, PLLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-86844</guid>
		<description>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-86816</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-86816</guid>
		<description>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Icma2002.Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-86815</link>
		<dc:creator>Icma2002.Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Consumers Want to Rip, Burn DVDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-86815</guid>
		<description>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or backing up encrypted DVDs remains illegal under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, with the exception of using film clips for educational purposes, a ruling that was made in 2006 and is set to expire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog &#187; 1201 rulemaking talk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Villa&#8217;s Blog &#187; 1201 rulemaking talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>[...] [Later: Band&#8217;s focus was on how DMCA creates antitrust-like problems, specifically tying, and how DMCA interferes with legitimate uses (similar to my rant about why DRM and fair use are fundamentally incompatible.) In discussing tying, he focused on Lexmark and similar cases, staying away from the iPod-market protection discussion. In discussing legitimate use, he focused on the 1201 exemption process for the academic fair use of films (which Bill McGeveran discusses here.) Apparently the MPAA actually had the gall to suggest that film professors should use a video camera to tape DVDs off a big screen. Nothing new for me, though parts of it were probably new to most of the audience.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Later: Band&#8217;s focus was on how DMCA creates antitrust-like problems, specifically tying, and how DMCA interferes with legitimate uses (similar to my rant about why DRM and fair use are fundamentally incompatible.) In discussing tying, he focused on Lexmark and similar cases, staying away from the iPod-market protection discussion. In discussing legitimate use, he focused on the 1201 exemption process for the academic fair use of films (which Bill McGeveran discusses here.) Apparently the MPAA actually had the gall to suggest that film professors should use a video camera to tape DVDs off a big screen. Nothing new for me, though parts of it were probably new to most of the audience.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustTV</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>JustTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;For Thanksgiving, let&#039;s be thankful for the U.S. Copyright Office...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yes, copyright policy is seriously out of balance, and there&#039;s rarely reason to be hopeful. But yesterday the forces for truth &amp; righteousness got a nice victory: the U.S. Copyright Office ruled that we film &amp; media educators can legally......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>For Thanksgiving, let&#8217;s be thankful for the U.S. Copyright Office&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yes, copyright policy is seriously out of balance, and there&#8217;s rarely reason to be hopeful. But yesterday the forces for truth &amp; righteousness got a nice victory: the U.S. Copyright Office ruled that we film &amp; media educators can legally&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawFont &#187; DMCA Rulemaking - new US exceptions, and how do they compare to us here in Oz?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>LawFont &#187; DMCA Rulemaking - new US exceptions, and how do they compare to us here in Oz?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/22/thanksgiving-for-new-dmca-exceptions/#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>[...] William McGeveran (Harvard) (good for film profs) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] William McGeveran (Harvard) (good for film profs) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
