<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Posner in Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William McGeveran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>William McGeveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>Ah, Tim, spoken like a good and loyal former John Minor Wisdom clerk!!!

It&#039;s something of which you rightly should be proud.  Indeed, he was a great judge.  We actually started the whole course with a great opinion by him.  There are other judges you could have nominated too.

But I will stick to my characterization that Posner is the most &lt;strong&gt;influential&lt;/strong&gt; since Hand, whether or not you always agree with him.  Posner has written so much heavily-cited stuff, on so many topics, both on and off the bench, that I think it&#039;s hard to compare anybody to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Tim, spoken like a good and loyal former John Minor Wisdom clerk!!!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s something of which you rightly should be proud.  Indeed, he was a great judge.  We actually started the whole course with a great opinion by him.  There are other judges you could have nominated too.</p>
<p>But I will stick to my characterization that Posner is the most <strong>influential</strong> since Hand, whether or not you always agree with him.  Posner has written so much heavily-cited stuff, on so many topics, both on and off the bench, that I think it&#8217;s hard to compare anybody to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/11/28/judge-posner-in-second-life/#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>In fairness, I think you should tell your civil procedure students that in between Learned Hand and Richard Posner there were Henry Friendly and John Minor Wisdom, both frequently mentioned as appellate jurists whose opinions were comparable in influence to those of the Supreme Court.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness, I think you should tell your civil procedure students that in between Learned Hand and Richard Posner there were Henry Friendly and John Minor Wisdom, both frequently mentioned as appellate jurists whose opinions were comparable in influence to those of the Supreme Court.  <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
