http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/12/11/no-action-on-paperless-voting-machines/ Information, Law, and the Law of Information Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:25:24 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/12/11/no-action-on-paperless-voting-machines/comment-page-1/#comment-105408 Commission Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:25:24 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/12/11/no-action-on-paperless-voting-machine#comment-105408 There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game.

]]> http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/12/11/no-action-on-paperless-voting-machines/comment-page-1/#comment-1693 Jim Graves Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:13:33 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2006/12/11/no-action-on-paperless-voting-machine#comment-1693 That's only half the story. The next day, the TGDC unanimously approved <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3647316" rel="nofollow">a revised version</a> that included grandfathering of existing machines. That’s only half the story. The next day, the TGDC unanimously approved a revised version that included grandfathering of existing machines.

]]>