<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Longhorn Lawsuit Exposes Disarray of Trademark Fair Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-trademark-fair-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-trademark-fair-use/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:34:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-trademark-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-56702</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-#comment-56702</guid>
		<description>It could definitely be described as a doctrinal problem, but that leads us to philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could definitely be described as a doctrinal problem, but that leads us to philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Info/Law on Super Bowl Sunday</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-trademark-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-4193</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Info/Law on Super Bowl Sunday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-#comment-4193</guid>
		<description>[...] This sounds a lot like the short-sightedness of other zealous IP claims made by entertainment businesses (like this and this, to take just a couple of recent examples from a rich history). Arguably, it is even more bone-headed for at least three reasons. Here is why: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This sounds a lot like the short-sightedness of other zealous IP claims made by entertainment businesses (like this and this, to take just a couple of recent examples from a rich history). Arguably, it is even more bone-headed for at least three reasons. Here is why: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unfair use</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-trademark-fair-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3247</link>
		<dc:creator>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unfair use</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/01/30/longhorn-lawsuit-exposes-disarray-of-#comment-3247</guid>
		<description>[...] More pain, very little gain &#8212; besides for lawyers&#8217; college funds &#8212; in the roiling world of trademark fair use. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More pain, very little gain &#8212; besides for lawyers&#8217; college funds &#8212; in the roiling world of trademark fair use. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
