<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CDA Section 230 Protects MySpace Against Negligence Claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; @LibelGirl: Call yr atty ASAP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-93151</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; @LibelGirl: Call yr atty ASAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-agai#comment-93151</guid>
		<description>[...] Assuming the apartment was not, in fact, &#8220;moldy,&#8221; I think the law may well be on Horizon&#8217;s side here. Bonnen&#8217;s Twitter stream was public, and a false statement that harms a business can be judged &#8220;defamation per se,&#8221; meaning that the plaintiff does not need to prove the details of damages. It&#8217;s another lesson that social media make many of our previously private conversations public, with potentially serious consequences. (Twitter, of course, is protected from the suit under Section 230.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Assuming the apartment was not, in fact, &#8220;moldy,&#8221; I think the law may well be on Horizon&#8217;s side here. Bonnen&#8217;s Twitter stream was public, and a false statement that harms a business can be judged &#8220;defamation per se,&#8221; meaning that the plaintiff does not need to prove the details of damages. It&#8217;s another lesson that social media make many of our previously private conversations public, with potentially serious consequences. (Twitter, of course, is protected from the suit under Section 230.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myspace Graphics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-52095</link>
		<dc:creator>Myspace Graphics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-agai#comment-52095</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been in this niche along time as a web master and try as parents and others might to put the blame on Myspace the fact is most parents do not monitor what their kids are doing (aka lazy parents). When something does go wrong they are quick to blame Myspace instead of themselves. Myspace has 65 million members they can&#039;t possibly monitor all of them 24/7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in this niche along time as a web master and try as parents and others might to put the blame on Myspace the fact is most parents do not monitor what their kids are doing (aka lazy parents). When something does go wrong they are quick to blame Myspace instead of themselves. Myspace has 65 million members they can&#8217;t possibly monitor all of them 24/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Defamation Lawsuit Deterred by &#8220;Wikimmunity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-6499</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Defamation Lawsuit Deterred by &#8220;Wikimmunity&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-agai#comment-6499</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the more interesting pieces in the most recent Harvard Journal of Law and Technology is &#8220;Wikimmunity,&#8221; by recent Harvard Law grad (and friend of Berkman) Ken Myers. Ken&#8217;s article, explores how Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (also the subject of my recent Doe v. MySpace post) acts, or should act, to protect sites like Wikipedia against third-party liability for defamatory or disparaging posts by their users. This topic was also the subject of a panel discussion at last summer&#8217;s Wikimania 2006 conference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the more interesting pieces in the most recent Harvard Journal of Law and Technology is &#8220;Wikimmunity,&#8221; by recent Harvard Law grad (and friend of Berkman) Ken Myers. Ken&#8217;s article, explores how Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (also the subject of my recent Doe v. MySpace post) acts, or should act, to protect sites like Wikipedia against third-party liability for defamatory or disparaging posts by their users. This topic was also the subject of a panel discussion at last summer&#8217;s Wikimania 2006 conference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-against-negligence-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-5616</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology &#38; Marketing Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/02/16/cda-section-230-protects-myspace-agai#comment-5616</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MySpace Suit for Liability for Sexual Assault Dismissed...&lt;/strong&gt;

By John Ottaviani Doe v. MySpace, Inc., No. A-06-CA983-SS (W.D. Tex. 2/13/2007). “If anyone had a duty to protect Julie......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MySpace Suit for Liability for Sexual Assault Dismissed&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>By John Ottaviani Doe v. MySpace, Inc., No. A-06-CA983-SS (W.D. Tex. 2/13/2007). “If anyone had a duty to protect Julie&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
