<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;What Ifs&#8221; Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/04/01/what-ifs-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/04/01/what-ifs-conference/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Sandwich Meat, or How Not To Protect Kids From Porn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/04/01/what-ifs-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-6722</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Sandwich Meat, or How Not To Protect Kids From Porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/04/01/what-ifs-conference/#comment-6722</guid>
		<description>[...] At a conference (see Bill&#8217;s post) at Michigan State (run by the indefatigable, immensely connected Peter Yu), I came across a proposal to help Internet users avoid porn. Intrigued, after years spent working with the ONI on filtering issues, I gave the Web site (at cp80.org) a read. The purported solution incorporates both legal and technical elements. My analysis: it’s not only a terrible idea, but it won’t work on either front. I&#8217;ll go through the problem statement, the technological proposal, and the legal proposal, then give my own thoughts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At a conference (see Bill&#8217;s post) at Michigan State (run by the indefatigable, immensely connected Peter Yu), I came across a proposal to help Internet users avoid porn. Intrigued, after years spent working with the ONI on filtering issues, I gave the Web site (at&nbsp;<a href="http://cp80.org" title="http://cp80. " target="_blank">cp80.org</a>) a read. The purported solution incorporates both legal and technical elements. My analysis: it’s not only a terrible idea, but it won’t work on either front. I&#8217;ll go through the problem statement, the technological proposal, and the legal proposal, then give my own thoughts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
