<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Identity Theft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rayana Peters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-104434</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayana Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-104434</guid>
		<description>Information like the one you brought up here will be very useful to me! I will place a link to this page on my blog. I am for certain my visitors will find that very useable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information like the one you brought up here will be very useful to me! I will place a link to this page on my blog. I am for certain my visitors will find that very useable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resveratrol</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-94203</link>
		<dc:creator>Resveratrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-94203</guid>
		<description>I don’t think Frank is suing you. But your comment shows another peril of anonymous speech online: picking the wrong pseudonym!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t think Frank is suing you. But your comment shows another peril of anonymous speech online: picking the wrong pseudonym!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity Truth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-52986</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-52986</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this type of identity theft popping all over some of the microblogging platforms such as twitter lately.  Interesting to see people try to gain traffic off other peoples identity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this type of identity theft popping all over some of the microblogging platforms such as twitter lately.  Interesting to see people try to gain traffic off other peoples identity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingCast</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-49185</link>
		<dc:creator>KingCast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-49185</guid>
		<description>Why on Earth did you pull  my links to the KingCast/Jesseman post?

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/03/harvard-law-school-agrees-with-kingcast.html

There&#039;s information in there now about Fuzzy Zoeller&#039;s case, which was also on point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on Earth did you pull  my links to the KingCast/Jesseman post?</p>
<p><a href="http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/03/harvard-law-school-agrees-with-kingcast.html" rel="nofollow">http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/03/harvard-law-school-agrees-with-kingcast.html</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s information in there now about Fuzzy Zoeller&#8217;s case, which was also on point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Reviews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-46911</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-46911</guid>
		<description>Now a new fear has raised its head because of the recent federal and the state laws that go into effect on January 1, 2008. For years anyone in the country illegally could (and still can) purchase any type of document on the street from some vendor. These fake documents can range from a Social Security card, drivers license, green card or practically anything else people are willing to pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now a new fear has raised its head because of the recent federal and the state laws that go into effect on January 1, 2008. For years anyone in the country illegally could (and still can) purchase any type of document on the street from some vendor. These fake documents can range from a Social Security card, drivers license, green card or practically anything else people are willing to pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William McGeveran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-13726</link>
		<dc:creator>William McGeveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-13726</guid>
		<description>fac_p:  I am a big supporter of anonymous blogging in general.  And of course everything I said in the post was hypothetical -- I don&#039;t think Frank is suing you.  But your comment shows another peril of anonymous speech online: picking the wrong pseudonym!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fac_p:  I am a big supporter of anonymous blogging in general.  And of course everything I said in the post was hypothetical &#8212; I don&#8217;t think Frank is suing you.  But your comment shows another peril of anonymous speech online: picking the wrong pseudonym!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fac_p</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-13725</link>
		<dc:creator>fac_p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-13725</guid>
		<description>Sorry, didn&#039;t notice the extra zero. 4500 hits. Accuracy, accuracy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, didn&#8217;t notice the extra zero. 4500 hits. Accuracy, accuracy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fac_p</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/comment-page-1/#comment-13724</link>
		<dc:creator>fac_p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/06/21/blogger-identity-theft/#comment-13724</guid>
		<description>Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa, I suppose I should have actually googled the name, I did for fac_p. But in setting up the hotmail address, I needed to put something in, so two names popped up from childhood--Frank and Pasquale and I didn&#039;t really notice any cross-over until last year when we ran a post on the telemetry issue with the hospital&#039;s orthopedic floor.

Really, being a local issue blog, I wouldn&#039;t have thought that a not-quite-piney-woods, East Texas issue would have come to light in such rarified surroundings, but when&lt;strike&gt; 45000&lt;/strike&gt; 4500 [correction from comment below] or so people hit the site in two days, I would say that it has gotten a bit larger than I might have foreseen.

And, if you will note, I have never tried to pass my self off in his identity, nor have I ever claimed to have a legal background.

All we wanted was decent treatment for both patients and employees.

Yes, it probably would qualify as harassment of a gripe site (does that qualify as a legal opinion? I&#039;d better be more circumspect.) Would I appreciate a good pro bono representation? You bet.

But, hopefully we haven&#039;t gotten there yet.

A question was asked as to why I didn&#039;t use my given name. In a right-to-work state, you can be terminated for the wrong color socks. We have been threatened with suspension for logging in to the site, or saying that we are running short-staffed. Termination if we posted to the blog anything identifiable. Perfect environment for an underground.

If I have caused any confusion, except by the newspaper and Essent, I truly apologize.

fac_p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa, I suppose I should have actually googled the name, I did for fac_p. But in setting up the hotmail address, I needed to put something in, so two names popped up from childhood&#8211;Frank and Pasquale and I didn&#8217;t really notice any cross-over until last year when we ran a post on the telemetry issue with the hospital&#8217;s orthopedic floor.</p>
<p>Really, being a local issue blog, I wouldn&#8217;t have thought that a not-quite-piney-woods, East Texas issue would have come to light in such rarified surroundings, but when<strike> 45000</strike> 4500 [correction from comment below] or so people hit the site in two days, I would say that it has gotten a bit larger than I might have foreseen.</p>
<p>And, if you will note, I have never tried to pass my self off in his identity, nor have I ever claimed to have a legal background.</p>
<p>All we wanted was decent treatment for both patients and employees.</p>
<p>Yes, it probably would qualify as harassment of a gripe site (does that qualify as a legal opinion? I&#8217;d better be more circumspect.) Would I appreciate a good pro bono representation? You bet.</p>
<p>But, hopefully we haven&#8217;t gotten there yet.</p>
<p>A question was asked as to why I didn&#8217;t use my given name. In a right-to-work state, you can be terminated for the wrong color socks. We have been threatened with suspension for logging in to the site, or saying that we are running short-staffed. Termination if we posted to the blog anything identifiable. Perfect environment for an underground.</p>
<p>If I have caused any confusion, except by the newspaper and Essent, I truly apologize.</p>
<p>fac_p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
