<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Demise of Times Select</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/</link>
	<description>Information, Law, and the Law of Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:08:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drikus Botha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-89438</link>
		<dc:creator>Drikus Botha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-89438</guid>
		<description>Only time will tell but it looks like the money prince will succeed in the end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only time will tell but it looks like the money prince will succeed in the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info/Law &#187; Wall Street Journal to Go Free Online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-61218</link>
		<dc:creator>Info/Law &#187; Wall Street Journal to Go Free Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-61218</guid>
		<description>[...] Once again, it&#8217;s great news for open access to high-quality journalism, and perhaps troubling news for online privacy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Once again, it&#8217;s great news for open access to high-quality journalism, and perhaps troubling news for online privacy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc Dow</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-55438</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-55438</guid>
		<description>Information overload is how to deal with this. Give them more than they dreamed of. Of course everyone must have an avatar. Filled to the last detail with nonsense.
The avatar&#039;s revenge!
Malc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information overload is how to deal with this. Give them more than they dreamed of. Of course everyone must have an avatar. Filled to the last detail with nonsense.<br />
The avatar&#8217;s revenge!<br />
Malc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Reviews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-46909</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-46909</guid>
		<description>Everyone is in it for profit. Even the huge corporations don&#039;t give things away for free without anything in return</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is in it for profit. Even the huge corporations don&#8217;t give things away for free without anything in return</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert T</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-29446</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-29446</guid>
		<description>Now the Wall Street Journal follows this path.  I think Google&#039;s success with online advertising has influenced the thinking of many with a large online presence.

Sadly, privacy is sacrificed when you flip the computer on these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the Wall Street Journal follows this path.  I think Google&#8217;s success with online advertising has influenced the thinking of many with a large online presence.</p>
<p>Sadly, privacy is sacrificed when you flip the computer on these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William McGeveran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-20780</link>
		<dc:creator>William McGeveran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-20780</guid>
		<description>Frank:  Yes, I contemplated adding some comments on the negative privacy implications of an advertising-dependent model for internet publications (since the profitability of the ads comes from a lot of tracking, data mining, and profiling).  Decided it was too complicated for an already too-long post.  But you&#039;re right, of course, it is the cloud accompanying that silver lining!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank:  Yes, I contemplated adding some comments on the negative privacy implications of an advertising-dependent model for internet publications (since the profitability of the ads comes from a lot of tracking, data mining, and profiling).  Decided it was too complicated for an already too-long post.  But you&#8217;re right, of course, it is the cloud accompanying that silver lining!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/comment-page-1/#comment-20778</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2007/09/18/times-select/#comment-20778</guid>
		<description>I completely agree.  The only sad side of this is: what if the prevailing norm is simply path of least resistance?  Is the flip side that what made ads so lucrative is the marketers ability to gather such a huge amount of information about us?

The system seems to have a logic of its own, forcing the Times to reveal its op-ed&#039;s to everyone (regardless of ability to pay), but also funneling readers into a system that makes us &amp; our habits really &quot;visible&quot; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.  The only sad side of this is: what if the prevailing norm is simply path of least resistance?  Is the flip side that what made ads so lucrative is the marketers ability to gather such a huge amount of information about us?</p>
<p>The system seems to have a logic of its own, forcing the Times to reveal its op-ed&#8217;s to everyone (regardless of ability to pay), but also funneling readers into a system that makes us &amp; our habits really &#8220;visible&#8221; too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
